Well, think about it for yourself. Don't worry about what I think. You can see the text: The only person ever referred to as "Lucifer" in scripture is said to be a human king of Babylon.So, if your reading and thinking of [Isaiah 14"12, 16] that Lucifer is a man, king of Babylon it will appear that there is no Lucifer, a devil and all that men know about him is a traditional belief, a myth. Is that what you mean?
That means that there is no scripture identifying Lucifer with Satan (or with anyone else, other than the king of Babylon).
Than means that those who make that identification do not have scriptural support for doing so.
That means it is a tradition that does not have scriptural support.
Of course, that does not say anything against the devil's existence, or any other things that the Bible says about the devil. It just means that Isaiah 14 is not one of the passages that talks about Satan and that Lucifer is not one of Satan's names, in scripture. Of course, you will not find that many respected teachers saying this, so you are welcome to go along with them, if it seems best. As you do, though, don't forget that there is no scripture affirming what they are saying about Lucifer or about the meaning of Isaiah 14.
Many of the images used by the prophets are strange. Isaiah likened one man to a "ball" and other to a "peg" (Isa.22). Prophets likened people to trees and to dry grass. Jesus even referred (without explanation) to one king as a "female fox." In the prophetic writings, Christ is Himself likened to a stone, a shoot out of dry ground, a lamb, a lion, letters of the alphabet (alpha and omega), a shepherd, and many other images—none of which are intended literally. We can often find reasonable meanings to the metaphors, but our recognition of them as metaphors need not await our ability to explain the reasons for their use.In Ezekiel 28:13-14 If the king of Tyre who was said to be in the Garden of Eden and describe as an anointed “cherub”
according to your words that the king of Tyre said to be in the Garden of Eden and anointed “cherub” are only figure of speech or an allegory, how do you explain that the King of Tyre to be in Eden and what does it means that he was anointed “cherub” according to the Scripture?
My guess is that Ezekiel uses the Garden of Eden as we might use the term "Paradise." Such a term can be used non-literally to convey the idea of a perfect environment. A cherub is a divinely-appointed angelic guardian (having four faces—one of a lion, one of an ox, one of an eagle and one of a man). A king, at his best, is a guardian to his people. The king of Tyre is described in such terms.