John 20:17

God, Christ, & The Holy Spirit
Dominic
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:43 pm

John 20:17

Post by Dominic » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:19 pm

Does anybody have thoughts on why Jesus asked Mary Magdalene not to touch him because he had not yet ascended in John 20:17? It sounds odd and his reason for asking her not touch him I can't understand.

User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Re: John 20:17

Post by mattrose » Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:25 pm

In my opinion, he was just informing her that she shouldn't 'hold on to' (or cling to) him. He wasn't going to be staying around. And she had a mission to perform.

User avatar
TheEditor
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by TheEditor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:36 pm

Greetings,

I used to ponder this too. I finally had the idea that what he was saying was, "Hey, it's okay. You don't need to hold on to me, I'm not gong anywhere just yet." I could be wrong, but it seems as good as any other view. :lol:

Regards, Brenden.
[color=#0000FF][b]"It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery."[/b][/color]

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: John 20:17

Post by Paidion » Sat Aug 16, 2014 10:04 am

Fascinating, Brenden! That idea has never occurred to me. :)
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
Jepne
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by Jepne » Sat Aug 16, 2014 11:01 am

Coming from a new Age background, I always thought it was some mystical kind of thing, as I had heard of Jesus and others referred to as 'ascended Masters'.
Now, of course, I see that Jesus has no equal, but the concept remains. And why did he use the word 'ascended'?

Maybe it was that he was just out of the grave and had to go see the Father before he did anything further on the earth. I suppose it was after he ascended that he came back and walked to Emmaus and ate with them by the sea. ??
"Anything you think you know about God that you can't find in the person of Jesus, you have reason to question.” - anonymous

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: John 20:17

Post by Paidion » Sat Aug 16, 2014 12:08 pm

Maybe it was that he was just out of the grave and had to go see the Father before he did anything further on the earth. I suppose it was after he ascended that he came back and walked to Emmaus and ate with them by the sea. ??
No, all of his post-resurrection appearances seem to have been prior to his ascension. (By the way, the Greek word translated "ascend" merely means "go up")
Jesus ascension is described in one verse in Acts—(Acts 1:9), one in Luke 24:51 and also one in Mark 16:19 (if Mark 16:9-20 is genuine).
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

Dominic
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by Dominic » Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:38 pm

I finally had the idea that what he was saying was, "Hey, it's okay. You don't need to hold on to me, I'm not gong anywhere just yet."
I can see this being a logical thought, thank you Brenden.

User avatar
Jepne
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by Jepne » Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:56 pm

Thanks, Paidion. It's always good to go directly to the scriptures. I love Christianity, it is so direct and simple!

I wish there was a 'like' button on here - I would 'like' all the other input on this thread. Thank you!
"Anything you think you know about God that you can't find in the person of Jesus, you have reason to question.” - anonymous

User avatar
TheEditor
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by TheEditor » Sat Aug 16, 2014 8:22 pm

Yes, it was one of those, "Maybe I'm over-thinking this" moments. I think the rendering "Touch me not" was what pushed most people to think of it in a mystical way. But since it can be rendered otherwise, I started to envision the scene where a child is all clingy and sad with a parent because they have been away and have been missed, and the parent might say, "It's okay, I'm here".

Regards, Brenden.
[color=#0000FF][b]"It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery."[/b][/color]

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: John 20:17

Post by dwilkins » Sat Aug 16, 2014 8:37 pm

I've heard it asserted that it had to do with her potentially causing him to become ceremonially unclean, which would be a significant problem for a High Priest who was about to go to heaven to minister in the real Holy of Holies.

Doug

Post Reply

Return to “Theology Proper, Christology, Pneumatology”