Hi BrendenTheEditor wrote:Hi Ken,
I'm late to this conversation, but I was curious; Are you a Catholic? I've never heard anyone say that the early Church councils were infallible, unless they had a Catholic background. Maybe I don't run in the right circles.
Regards, Brenden.
No, I'm not RC. However, I believe that:
1. The Bible is without error and its interpretation is without error if based on all the passages on any topic.
2. The Protestants and Jews say that there are only 39 Canonical Old Testament books (the Hebrew/ Aramaic Tanakh), based on a declaration by a Council of Rabbis at Jamnia in Palestine, which is near Jerusalem, around 90 AD. At http://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/canon.cfm, it states"The formation of the New Testament canon began in the early part of the second century A.D. The earliest list was drawn up in Rome, in A.D. 140, by the heretic Marcion. Although his list was not authoritative, it did demonstrate that the idea of a New Testament canon was accepted at that time.
The concept we have today of a completed Bible was formulated early in the history of the church. By the end of the second century all but seven books (Hebrews, 2 and 3 John, 2 Peter, Jude, James, and Revelation) were recognized as apostolic, and by the end of the fourth century all twenty-seven books in our present canon were recognized by all the churches of the West. After the Damasine Council of Rome in A.D. 332 and the third Council of Carthage in A.D. 397 the question of the Canon was closed in the West. By the year 500 the whole Greek-speaking church had also accepted all the books in our present New Testament."
3. Since early councils (pre-500 AD) decided the canon of New Testament Scripture, it seems to me arbitrary to pick and choose among the other early church councils as to which ones we will believe and accept. I believe God protected His church from error.
4. Once the canon of Scripture was solidly established, I believe human error/bias began to occur in church councils.
kenblogton