Book Club: One God & One Lord

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3112
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by darinhouston » Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:49 am

Considering the interest in the threads on the Trinity, I thought some might like to read a book together and share thoughts as they read it. I am really enjoying it, and so far even if one remains trinitarian through it, there is much to consider in the topics discussed as to the dual nature of man, the First and Second Adam, and much more. I have been edified by it even as I await resolution of a few scriptures that remain in my mind -- I highly recommend buying the book (the Kindle Edition is only $1.99) if only for the Appendices (also available separately for free online) which, among other things, include great references of relevant proof-texts.
One God & One Lord: Reconsidering the Cornerstone of the Christian Faith -- $29 (Kindle Edition is only $1.99)

"http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004FG ... UTF8&psc=1"

dizerner

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by dizerner » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:55 am

[user account removed]
Last edited by dizerner on Sun Feb 19, 2023 1:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by Paidion » Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:36 pm

Darin, I went directly to the "Biblical Unitarian" website and read several chapters of the book.

In ONE sense, I might be considered unitarian, in the sense that Jesus called His Father "the only real God." (John 17:3) and therefore I recognize the Father as "the only real God". But I can't believe that Jesus had no pre-existence. He clearly said, "Before Abraham was, I am." John 1:18 calls Jesus (in the pre-300 Greek manuscripts) "the only-begotten God". Clearly that is inconsistent with normal Unitarian teaching.

I'd bring up John 1:1 again, which affirms that the Logos was God in some sense. But I know that the author wiggles out of that one, but denying that the Logos was the son of God, the pre-incarnate Jesus. In one chapter, he indicates that Jesus was created. As I see it, the author is unwilling to accept second-century wisdom, or to take the Scriptures in a straight-forward manner, but simply tries to fit scripture into his Unitarian concepts through a lot of re-interpretation.
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
jarrod
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:49 pm

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by jarrod » Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:21 am

I am only on page 89 in iBooks (not sure what chapter that is) so I probably don't have a clear understanding of his thesis yet, but I do find it to be a tedious read.

The authors place such an emphasis on the comparison between the first adam with Jesus that they allow for no differences in the origin or the physical and spiritual make-up of the two. I agree with Paidon's assessment that their message seems to indicate that Jesus had no pre-existence before His birth because if He did then he certainly wouldn't be of the pattern of Adam (Romans 5:14). There are just too many verses against this train of thought.

The other difficulty I have with the book is the idea that Jesus could not truly be a man or die if He were also God. I could be wrong in my understanding, but I think a main characteristic of "man" is this body of flesh and blood that our immaterial soul/spirit inhabits. Since the Spirit of God can certainly take abode in us, I do not think it a stretch to believe the immaterial Spirit of the Word of God could become incarnate in a real body thus being fully God (immaterial) and fully man (material). In this manner, Jesus' body could experience death, though his Spirit await the resurrection 3 days later.

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3112
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by darinhouston » Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:14 am

If by "God incarnate" we only mean that he had the Spirit abiding in Him (which is largely how I see it), then one could hardly see that as an eternally existing separate person. That Spirit would be the same Spirit that is the Father, no? The Father (not called that in OT) dwelt in the tabernacle or temple or was embodied (so to speak) as a pillar of fire etc. That was surely the Father. Now, that same Spirit dwells within us and possibly completely in Jesus. That doesn't sound very Trinitarian to modern ears, though I've read a number of Trinitarian works that would essentially hold that view (as I recall). I think the author here would share that view to a point.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3112
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by darinhouston » Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:17 am

You can say he wiggles out of certain texts, but all positions seem to do a lot of wiggling on this issue (or ignore certain texts). I suppose our presuppositions and bias determine whether it is legitimate wigglehood. I'm not done yet but I think you'll find he handles the I am passages.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3112
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by darinhouston » Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:51 pm

Hey Jarrod, could the Father be sort of a class object and the Son an instance or subclass? What would the Spirit be?

I thought we could use a "palate cleanser."

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Homer
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by Homer » Mon Jun 30, 2014 11:34 pm

Hi Darin,

You wrote:
The Father (not called that in OT) dwelt in the tabernacle or temple or was embodied (so to speak) as a pillar of fire etc. That was surely the Father
You would not say, I think, that God was wholly in the temple, or in a pillar of fire would you? And if not, could God appear on earth as a man, and not be wholly contained in that man? And if so, could that man communicate through prayer with that part of God not wholly contained in the man?

User avatar
jarrod
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:49 pm

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by jarrod » Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:49 am

I like it! Or perhaps the parent class is God and the Father, the Word, and the Spirit are all derived classes. Taking this further, the Word subclass could also be Polymorphic, subclassing Man as well ;) Then each "Instance" would have a "roles" attribute that would be separate.
darinhouston wrote:Hey Jarrod, could the Father be sort of a class object and the Son an instance or subclass? What would the Spirit be?

I thought we could use a "palate cleanser."
Well, I see the Word as with God (separate) while also being God (eternal). The Word was the one that took on flesh, not the Father, so I would not see Him as the "same Spirit" as the Father. Honestly, I do not hold tightly the somewhat popular view of the Trinity, though I am happy to accept it as it makes quasi-sense in my mind. I just want to know God how He is, not how some doctrine tells me to believe. Rather than making Jesus out to be Man and not God in some sense, I would be more inclined to not see the Spirit as a separate individual.
darinhouston wrote:If by "God incarnate" we only mean that he had the Spirit abiding in Him (which is largely how I see it), then one could hardly see that as an eternally existing separate person. That Spirit would be the same Spirit that is the Father, no? The Father (not called that in OT) dwelt in the tabernacle or temple or was embodied (so to speak) as a pillar of fire etc. That was surely the Father. Now, that same Spirit dwells within us and possibly completely in Jesus. That doesn't sound very Trinitarian to modern ears, though I've read a number of Trinitarian works that would essentially hold that view (as I recall). I think the author here would share that view to a point.
I have wondered about the I am passages, along with Colossians and others... I am interested to see how he handles those.
darinhouston wrote:I'm not done yet but I think you'll find he handles the I am passages.

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3112
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Book Club: One God & One Lord

Post by darinhouston » Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:26 am

Homer, perhaps it's similar. God can be in more than one place at once. But we don't consider the pillar a separate person.

Jarrod, so why don't we say the Word is the second person of the trinity? I could respect that position better. If the word manifest as Jesus just like the Father manifest as the pillar, we would need to be consistent in how we treat the pillar and the man.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post Reply

Return to “The Trinity”