Interview with Antony Flew

Post Reply
User avatar
RICHinCHRIST
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:27 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Interview with Antony Flew

Post by RICHinCHRIST » Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:26 am

British philosopher and former atheist, Antony Flew, became a deist in 2004. He said he renounced his atheism because “the argument for Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it."

The following link is an interview with Flew by Gary Habermas, an American apologist. I found it interesting that Flew changed his mind about the existence of God due to the evidence of modern molecular biology in regards to the complexity of DNA information and the consideration of the origin of life.

However, when asked why he wouldn't accept one of the 'revelatory' faith systems, he began with his critique of Christianity and Islam. He critiqued both systems due to the emphasis on predestination and determinism (in light of evil in the world), and also the doctrine of eternal conscious hell. He still had trouble believing in the resurrection of Jesus, but he said that it was the most logical and evidentially supportable religious miracle he knew of. I wish he could have learned about a different view than that of Calvinism and of hell! Those were his two most contested doctrines, and perhaps if he had heard a better explanation of them he might have become a Christian.

http://www.biola.edu/antonyflew/flew-interview.pdf

User avatar
KyleB
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:04 am
Location: Creswell, OR

Re: Interview with Antony Flew

Post by KyleB » Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:42 pm

Thanks for posting this Rich! There is an athiest friend at work with whom I have frequent philosophical discussions. Recently I mentioned the concept of "irreducible complexity" to him, he might find this article thought provoking.

-Kyle

User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Re: Interview with Antony Flew

Post by mattrose » Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:28 pm

Here is a review of Flew's book (I wrote this in 2007 after I read it):

I have finished reading "There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind" by Antony Flew. Flew's 'conversion' from atheism was made public on December 9th, 2004, but only in this volume do we get a detailed account of the long process and the specific evidence that led him to make such a drastic change in worldview.

The theme of the book is simple enough to discern. We must pursue the truth no matter where it leads us and such a pursuit leads us to admit the existence of a divine Mind. The book begins with a preface by Roy Abraham Varghese and his critique of the 'new atheism.' Next, we encounter and introduction from Flew where he dismisses 'other explanations' for his conversion from atheism (old age, special revelation, alliance with a church, etc).

The bulk of the book is a mini-biography of Flew and his atheism. He was, in fact, the son of a preacher (a Wesleyan-Methodist preacher, no less). He confesses, though, that he never felt any desire to commune with God, but credits his father with instilling, in him, a passionate pursuit of truth. Despite his early upbringing, Flew became a committed atheist by the age of 15, no longer able to reconcile the presence of pain with the existence of God (nor Calvinistic double-predestination). Flew now believes his conversion to atheism was done far too quickly and easily.

As a young scholar, Flew was a regular participant in the Socratic Club, presided over by C.S. Lewis from 1942 to 1954. Though un-convinced by his reasoning, Lewis was persuasive in convincing Flew to follow the evidence wherever it leads. Early on, Flew felt the evidence cemented his atheism. He spent much of his adult life writing for the presumption of atheism and against arguments for theism. Along the way, Flew debated some of the greatest thinkers of theism (including Alvin Plantinga, William Lane Craig & Gary Habermas). It was through these debates that Flew became aware of John Wesley's 'Arminian' alternatives to Calvinism. Already considering Wesley one of his country's great sons, this alternative proved significant in clearing the way back to belief in a divine Mind.

Flew then gives his four main reasons for accepting the existence of God: The existence of 'laws' in nature, a universed 'finely tuned' for life, the emergence of life at all, especially in regards to the complex nature of life as we now know it, and, finally, the 'beginning' of the universe in general. In light of these considerations, then, Flew comments that, "I have followed the argument where it has led me. And it has led me to accept the existence of a self-existent, immutable, immaterial, omnipresent, and omniscient Being" and adds that he is "entirely open to learning more about the divine Reality."

After further critique of the 'new atheism' by Varghese, Flew allows N.T. Wright to present a case of the historicity of Jesus and His resurrection. Why? In Flews' own words, "In point of fact, I think that the Christian religion is the one religion that most clearly deserves to be honored and respected whether or not its claim to be a divine revelation is true. There is nothing like the combination of a charismatic figure like Jesus and a first-class intellectual like St. Paul." Flew believes Bishop Wright's argument for Jesus' resurrection is "absolutely wonderful, absolutely radical, and very powerful."

Wright first dismisses the ridiculous claim that Jesus never existed as completely unorthodox among Christian and secular historians alike. He then argues that Jesus was God incarnate by pointing out Jesus' behavior as the Word, wisdom, glory, law & Spirit of God. Finally, the Bishop argues that the resurrection of Christ is the best historical explanation for the empty tomb, appearances, and the radical nature of the early Christian beliefs.

All in all, a very worthwhile read. At times, the philosophical and scientific discussions were over my head, but, at the same time, Flew comes across as a very real person who honestly pursued atheism and honestly abandoned it in these past few years. Though he now considers himself a 'deist,' it is clear that he is considering Christianity. I pray his pursuit of truth continues to lead him closer to the Truth, namely, Jesus Christ.

User avatar
Jepne
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: Interview with Antony Flew

Post by Jepne » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:51 pm

Thank you for this. Good review - it has piqued my interest in this very interesting man.
"Anything you think you know about God that you can't find in the person of Jesus, you have reason to question.” - anonymous

Post Reply

Return to “Christian Evidences & Challenges”