Proper grammar

User avatar
dwight92070
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:09 am

Proper grammar

Post by dwight92070 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 5:49 pm

On a lighter note (hopefully), I have always been quite surprised to hear Steve and others use the word "stumbling" or "stumbled" in what appears to be an improper grammatical way. For example, the topic titled "Stumbling your brother". Shouldn't that be "Causing your brother to stumble"? Many times Steve has used the word similarly and it does not seem to be proper grammar.

User avatar
Candlepower
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Proper grammar

Post by Candlepower » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:41 pm

dwight92070 wrote:"Stumbling your brother". Shouldn't that be "Causing your brother to stumble"?
Among the several correct uses of stumbling, (listed in dictionary.com) is this: to cause to stumble; trip.

1 Peter 2:8 says, “A stone of stumbling and a rock of offense.”

I suppose if a stone can stumble me (cause me to trip), so can a brother.

User avatar
Michelle
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: Proper grammar

Post by Michelle » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:46 pm

I love the English language, and one of the things I like the most is that new words are added and usage changes over time. Isn't it fun when you notice what appears to be a change while it is happening?

User avatar
backwoodsman
Posts: 536
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Not quite at the ends of the earth, but you can see it from here.

Re: Proper grammar

Post by backwoodsman » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:58 pm

That's not a new use of the word; it goes back at least as far as Webster's 1828 edition.

User avatar
dwight92070
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:09 am

Re: Proper grammar

Post by dwight92070 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:16 pm

Candlepower wrote:
dwight92070 wrote:"Stumbling your brother". Shouldn't that be "Causing your brother to stumble"?
Among the several correct uses of stumbling, (listed in dictionary.com) is this: to cause to stumble; trip.

1 Peter 2:8 says, “A stone of stumbling and a rock of offense.”

I suppose if a stone can stumble me (cause me to trip), so can a brother.
Dwight: Right there, your last sentence, IMO, is incorrect grammar. If you Google "stumbled", or "stumbling", I don't believe you will ever see it used that way. A stone does not stumble me, rather it is a stone that causes someone to stumble.

User avatar
dwight92070
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:09 am

Re: Proper grammar

Post by dwight92070 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:22 pm

backwoodsman wrote:That's not a new use of the word; it goes back at least as far as Webster's 1828 edition.
Dwight: Do you have that definition handy, so we can see it?

User avatar
backwoodsman
Posts: 536
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Not quite at the ends of the earth, but you can see it from here.

Re: Proper grammar

Post by backwoodsman » Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:18 am

dwight92070 wrote:
backwoodsman wrote:That's not a new use of the word; it goes back at least as far as Webster's 1828 edition.
Dwight: Do you have that definition handy, so we can see it?
Look for "verb transitive" here:
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/stumble

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Proper grammar

Post by Paidion » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:46 am

Yep. You settled that point, Backwoodsman.

It seems odd that the more common points of bad grammar are seldom addressed—for example, the past tense and present participle of "lie."
So often we hear someone say, "When I was laying in my bed" instead of "When I was lying in my bed" or "I laid on the couch" instead of "I lay on the couch."

Once, around Christmas time, I heard a brother read Luke 2:16 as "And they went with haste and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby laying in a manger." Though the word was clearly "lying" in the text from which he was reading, he read it as "laying."

As a teacher, I had the pupils use a grammar program prepared by the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education. One of the tasks for the pupils was to choose which of the following was correct:
(A) "Yesterday, the girl laid on the beach."
(B) Yesterday, the girl lay on the beach."

If the pupil selected the correct sentence (B), then the program pronounced his response as "incorrect."

I don't think I have EVER heard anyone using the past participle of the word, i.e. "lain." (For example, "She had lain on the beach for about an hour.")

At age 22, I took my teacher training in Manitoba. When I was being observed in practice teaching, my instructor said, "You're from Ontario, aren't you?"
"How did you know?" I asked her. She replied, "You said to the pupils, 'Git out your books,' instead of 'Get out your books'."
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
dwight92070
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:09 am

Re: Proper grammar

Post by dwight92070 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:58 pm

It's interesting that Charles Harrington Elster today apparently disagrees with Webster:

Is it proper to say, "I stumbled my brother"? That is, as opposed to "I caused my brother to stumble." Thanks, Dwight

The verb to "stumble" is intransitive, meaning it does not act on an object, as opposed to a transitive verb, which needs an object to act on. In "She hit the ball," the verb to "hit" is transitive; it acts on the ball. But in "I can walk," the verb to "walk" is intransitive; it performs an action without having to perform it on something.

"Stumble" was once transitive, meaning "to trip, cause to fall," but that use faded in the mid 17th-century. Today "stumble" is only intransitive, meaning that you cannot "stumble your brother"; he must stumble on his own. Whether you flung an impediment in his path to cause him to stumble on his own is another matter. See the story of Cain and Abel in Genesis. — CHE

Dwight: So, if I understand correctly, "stumble" was once transitive, but faded away in the mid 1600's, and is now only intransitive.

User avatar
Candlepower
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Proper grammar

Post by Candlepower » Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:32 pm

Continuing the good fun in the playground of English Grammar.... :)

According to Merriam Webster, stumble, stumbled, and stumbling can all be used as either transitive or intransitive verbs. If you go to the site you will see that at the writer's discretion, those words can be used correctly either way...transitively or intransitively. Here's the link: http://www.dictionary.com/

One could say, "My horse stumbled on the road" (intransitive) and be correct. Or, "That stone in the road stumbled my horse" (transitive) and be correct. One might even say, "Watch out! That stone will stumble your horse also (transitive) and be correct. Another might add, "If someone don't get that there stone outa the road, it'll be stumblin' horses all day!" (Incorrect spelling and grammar in that last sentence perhaps, but the use of stumbling is not incorrect.)

Also, according to Webster, the British Dictionary definition of stumble does not allow for a transitive use. Pity.

Therefore, in America it's okay to say, "...if a stone can stumble me, so can a brother." Using stumble transitively may sound odd to some, but I'm not going to let stumble stumble me.

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”