Chat for FBF?
Chat for FBF?
Why don't we have a live IRC channel or something for those on the forum? That would be fun! Have any of you guys tried that/set that up before?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
"How is it that Christians today will pay $20 to hear the latest Christian concert, but Jesus can't draw a crowd?"
- Jim Cymbala (Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire) on prayer meetings
- Jim Cymbala (Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire) on prayer meetings
I have trouble enough with my sentence structures as it is. Can you imagine how bad it would be if I had to do it on the fly? 
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
-
_brody_in_ga
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:55 pm
- Location: Richland Ga
I second this idea. It would be great.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
For our God is a consuming fire.
Hebrews 12:29
Hebrews 12:29
Oh, alrightMichelleM wrote:Oh c'mon, that's half the fun.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
-
_darin-houston
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:07 am
- Location: Houston, TX
My concern would be two-fold (yet related).
First, there is less of a filter in place if there is no record or public discussion. Second, it tends towards quips and flip comments and usually tends to criticism rather than honest dialogue.
Also, it limits participation to real-time online availability.
If you want, give it a try -- there's really nothing to set up -- go to a publicly available server and add a channel and announce it here. If it devolves, we can quit using it.
It would add an interesting dynamic during or immediately following the radio show (though many of us only listen through archive as we are at work during the broadcast).
First, there is less of a filter in place if there is no record or public discussion. Second, it tends towards quips and flip comments and usually tends to criticism rather than honest dialogue.
Also, it limits participation to real-time online availability.
If you want, give it a try -- there's really nothing to set up -- go to a publicly available server and add a channel and announce it here. If it devolves, we can quit using it.
It would add an interesting dynamic during or immediately following the radio show (though many of us only listen through archive as we are at work during the broadcast).
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
Its been a long time ago, but Talk City used to be a good one and ParaChat is a free one.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
If you have a computer that's Windows 98, SECOND Edition or newer, Paltalk would be the way to go, imo. It has text and voice (but I have Windows 98, FIRST Edition, so can't do that).
Btw, I used to play Steve's Romans and Revelation lectures in my Paltalk room...when I could get in there, that is.
Before summer I should have a computer with XP and will definitely be back in Paltalk.
Just an idea for y'all to consider.
Btw, I used to play Steve's Romans and Revelation lectures in my Paltalk room...when I could get in there, that is.
Before summer I should have a computer with XP and will definitely be back in Paltalk.
Just an idea for y'all to consider.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth
-
_featheredprop
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:41 pm
- Location: PA
Re: Chat for FBF?
... sounds like fun.
peace,
dane
peace,
dane
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
"God - He'll bloody your nose and then give you a ride home on his bicycle..." Rich Mullins 1955-1997