You wrote:Wow what a major contradiction. I just found out that NT Wright is a Calvinist.
(NT Wright wrote):
"Let me, as a good Calvinist, offer you five points about Paul."
Yes, NTW said this at his 2003 lecture on "New Perspectives on Paul."
But did he mean he was a "5-Point Calvinist?"
Here are the 5 points Wright made in that lecture.
"Let me, as a good Calvinist, offer you five points about Paul which I regard as crucial in the present debates, justification itself being the fifth." (with his 5 points being):
1. The Gospel
2. The Righteousness of God
3. Final Judgment According to Works
4. Ordo Salutis
5. Justification"
Obviously, these aren't the 5 points of TULIP (NTW wasn't making a case for them but had his other 5 points in mind).
On another forum I started a thread asking in what sense is NTW a Calvinist. The consensus was that he is not a standard (regular) 5-Point Calvinist. While I agree with this, I'm still trying to figure out exactly what NTW meant.
From the Sydney Anglicans Forum based in Australia, I found a poster named Alan Dungey wrote this:
Perhaps NTW was using "Calvinist" as a kind of synonym to say he was "Reformed"? Or it could be that he was acknowledging that his church, The Church of England, was historically Calvinist, at least at the times of the Synod of Dort?Anglican representatives, including a Welsh Bishop, took part in the Synod of Dort and endorsed its resolutions, under King James I. The Church of England was certainly regarded as part of the Reformed family of churches in those days, and hence Calvinist.
Btw, Paul, Darin and I have discussed this here.