Re: The Apostle Paul's Conversion
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 5:57 pm
Well that 'would' be saying we are in the future. Now you are suggesting we have three selves. Or, actually you would need billions of selves for each and every moment in time that God sees.Never did I say we our in the future. Our future selves are in the future, just as our past selves are in the past
God has not said He is 'at all times', or 'in' the past, and 'in' the future. He said He is the beginning and the end, not that God is 'in' either of those places in time. God said He will bring whatever He wants to past, and into existence.God is the one who is at all times and all places
This idea would actually have us, everyone and everything 'in all times and all places'God is the one who is at all times and all places
Time travel is a relatively modern idea, popularized by science fiction, although there are some obscure mythological and scattered religious stories about time travel, it is unknown to scripture. And it is not necessary to scripture. There is no 'reason' for God to have to see, travel, or move through time, as if God needs to adjust something, or remember something. God should not have to see something happen in order to know what will happen. The idea that God needs to 'see' the future 'in order to know it' makes God dumber, not smarter. If 'I' could see the future, then I would be as smart as God in this area too. God does not need to see the future to predict it, or bring it to past.So you really see God as time-bound being?