I while back I found a nice copy of Bell's "Love Wins" at one of my favorite book stores (Goodwill or St. Vinnie's, can't remember). Anyway, after reading the book I concluded it isn't quite fair to count Bell as a universalist. While he said things that would leave that impression, he never clearly said so as far as I could see. He did redefine hell as something you make for yourself, so I suppose he could be a "no-heller" when considered in regard to more traditional views of hell.
I'm curious if in his other writings or sermons if he has unambiguously put himself in the universalist camp.