Olson Blog on Universalism

Post Reply
User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by mattrose » Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:48 am

I thought this was a good blog post by Roger Olson. I especially found this quote interesting...

"Universalists are Calvinists with soft hearts and a true vision of the love of God shown in Jesus Christ. Arminians are immune to universalism because we believe God’s love includes permitting the beloved to walk away and reject God’s mercy."

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2015/01/2627/

dizerner

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by dizerner » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:54 am

[user account removed]
Last edited by dizerner on Tue Feb 21, 2023 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by Paidion » Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:36 pm

"Universalists are Calvinists with soft hearts and a true vision of the love of God shown in Jesus Christ."
I believe in the ultimate reconciliation of all people to God, and yet I strongly reject Calvinism. I don't call myself a "Universalist" because to many people's minds, this designation implies the belief that all people will automatically go to heaven, with or without repentance. My belief is that everyone will have to repent and submit to the authority of the Messiah, just as you and I did, in order to get right with God, and that everyone will, in fact, do that, sooner or later, of his own free will. As one character in a novel by George MacDonald said to another, "You'll either repent now, or you'll repent in hell!"

"Arminians are immune to universalism because we believe God’s love includes permitting the beloved to walk away and reject God’s mercy."
I, also "believe that God’s love includes permitting the beloved to walk away and reject God’s mercy." But I am not an Arminian.
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
Homer
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by Homer » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:22 pm

Hey, Olson has stolen that idea from me! I have long argued that universalism is as deterministic as Calvinism. Good example are the Primitive Baptists who out do the Calvinists regarding Calvinism and are universalists.

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by Paidion » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:48 pm

Yes, there are a number of universalists who believe God will override free will in order to save all. I don't think they are in the majority.

ONE BRANCH of the Primitive Baptists hold to universalism. But the main original group does not.

Here is their website:

http://www.primitive-baptist.com/
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by Paidion » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:59 pm

Here's an issue of The Remnant, a publication of the main Primitive Baptist group, which clearly teaches that Jesus died for only the elect:

http://www.primitive-baptist.com/remnan ... 9-MA14.pdf
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

Choosethisday
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:30 pm

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by Choosethisday » Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:48 am

I automatically receive the emails from the Patheos forum whenever Roger Olson posts articles there. I find him and Steve among the limited number of people who, and I don't feel this way just because I generally agree with them, make cogent arguments that avoid the constrictions of the traditionalists understanding of Scripture. Several days ago, in reviewing a book written by a Calvinist, he coined or repeated a phrase I had not heard before. He used the term "Popes" in referring to the many popular evangelistic leaders who seem to shape and define evangelistic theology. So many evangelicals defer to these popes without ever critically examining their positions. Even my pastor tried to sustain a position him and I disagree over based on John Piper's position. Right or wrong, we should defer to Scripture and coherent logic instead of popular leaders. I urge others to read more of Olson's postings.

User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by mattrose » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:29 pm

My comment on Olson's blog was that calvinists are more likely to become dogmatic universalists, in my opinion. Arminians are more likely to become hopeful universalists. Of course, there are always exceptions.

User avatar
steve
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:45 pm

Re: Olson Blog on Universalism

Post by steve » Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:24 pm

Here's an issue of The Remnant, a publication of the main Primitive Baptist group, which clearly teaches that Jesus died for only the elect:

http://www.primitive-baptist.com/remnan ... 9-MA14.pdf
I read part of the lead article and found it amusing (and alarming) that the author quoted a number of scriptures about God "hating" and "abhoring" the "workers of iniquity" (which would have to include "the elect" prior to their conversions!), and then went on to affirm that Jesus did not die to atone for those whom He hated and abhorred.

Yet, the Bible says that, "While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Rom.5:8). While we were yet sinners, many of us were "the wicked" and and "the workers of iniquity"—yet Jesus died for us, according to Paul. How, then, can it be denied that Jesus died for those whom He "hated" and "abhorred"?

Post Reply

Return to “Views of Hell”