153 Fish?
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:50 pm
A while back I called Steve asking if he had any theories on why John 21:11 says specifically that the disciples caught exactly 153 fish. I am teaching on that chapter tonight so I've been reading numerous explanations and thought I'd share a summary....
Interpretations of the 153 Fish
It is not necessarily surprising that the fish were counted (either for sale purposes or simple curiosity over the miracle). Therefore, it is possible that the number was simply recorded as added detail and has no symbolic value. Numerous theories, however, have been presented as to potential significance to the number 153.
1) Jerome suggested that there were exactly 153 kinds of fish. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the fact that the Gospel was to spread to ‘all kinds’ of people. But this appears to be a case of ‘cooking the books’ b/c we have no record of an ancient belief that there were exactly 153 kinds of fish.
2) Augustine, noting that 153 is the triangular number of 17, broke 17 down into 10 + 7. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the complete revelation of God constituted by the Law (10 commandments) and the Spirit (Revelation 1:4). Or, perhaps it refers to 5 (loaves) + 12 (baskets left-over and therefore is symbolic of fruitfulness). But this sort of breaking down of 17 seems somewhat arbitrary.
3) Others see the passage as the fulfillment of Ezekiel 47:10. Using Hebrew gematria, the words Gedi and Eglaim add up to 17 and 153 respectively. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the eschatological collection of ‘all kinds’ of people into the Kingdom of God.
The possible significance of ‘153’ will not be appreciated if we are unaware that gematria was a well known practice in the ancient world. After reading chapter 13 (The 153 fish and the unity of the fourth gospel) of Richard Bauckham's book 'The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple' I am impressed with his argument that '153' was indeed connected to Ezekiel 47:10 via gematria.
PS... this is just a 'fun' topic. It's not important that people see the significance of 153 (if indeed it is significant). Bauckham, though, does use his theory to show that chapter 21 was not a later addition (I won't go into the details on how he demonstrates that).
Interpretations of the 153 Fish
It is not necessarily surprising that the fish were counted (either for sale purposes or simple curiosity over the miracle). Therefore, it is possible that the number was simply recorded as added detail and has no symbolic value. Numerous theories, however, have been presented as to potential significance to the number 153.
1) Jerome suggested that there were exactly 153 kinds of fish. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the fact that the Gospel was to spread to ‘all kinds’ of people. But this appears to be a case of ‘cooking the books’ b/c we have no record of an ancient belief that there were exactly 153 kinds of fish.
2) Augustine, noting that 153 is the triangular number of 17, broke 17 down into 10 + 7. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the complete revelation of God constituted by the Law (10 commandments) and the Spirit (Revelation 1:4). Or, perhaps it refers to 5 (loaves) + 12 (baskets left-over and therefore is symbolic of fruitfulness). But this sort of breaking down of 17 seems somewhat arbitrary.
3) Others see the passage as the fulfillment of Ezekiel 47:10. Using Hebrew gematria, the words Gedi and Eglaim add up to 17 and 153 respectively. Thus, the ‘153’ was symbolic for the eschatological collection of ‘all kinds’ of people into the Kingdom of God.
The possible significance of ‘153’ will not be appreciated if we are unaware that gematria was a well known practice in the ancient world. After reading chapter 13 (The 153 fish and the unity of the fourth gospel) of Richard Bauckham's book 'The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple' I am impressed with his argument that '153' was indeed connected to Ezekiel 47:10 via gematria.
PS... this is just a 'fun' topic. It's not important that people see the significance of 153 (if indeed it is significant). Bauckham, though, does use his theory to show that chapter 21 was not a later addition (I won't go into the details on how he demonstrates that).