Here's another adage which may well be applicable:Dwight wrote:And you "will not see" what I just posted. So who's the blind one?
Convince a man against his will; he's of the same opinion still.
Here's another adage which may well be applicable:Dwight wrote:And you "will not see" what I just posted. So who's the blind one?
darinhouston wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 8:09 pm
Clearly, this does not end the issue for many truth-seeking individuals who know and love God - if it's enough of an argument for you, then great - go your way - why do you feel compelled to repeat your declarative "arguments" ?
Dwight - And you guys are not declaring YOUR "arguments"? Who are you kidding?
We are exploring texts and arguments here, not just trying to enforce a view.
Dwight - The view you're attempting to enforce is LOUD and CLEAR - Jesus is NOT God. As if your motives are pure and mine are not?
If you think these are just "games," then I recommend you just move on to other topics.
Dwight - The word "worship" is clear. The fact that only God can rightfully be worshipped is clear. The fact that Jesus was worshipped is also clear. But to accept those facts, but still deny that Jesus is God is playing games with words and meanings.
No one is playing games here. No one is rebelling, they are investigating and exploring
Dwight - I believe there are games being played and rebelling going on.
- the reason to have these debates here among those with open minds is to avoid unnecessary confusion in the body of Christ
Dwight - You are just as close-minded with your conclusions and view points as you think I am. You act as if you're open-minded, which is good, but I'm close-minded, which is bad. You and Paidon are very condescending and you both love to ridicule and mock any who dare to disagree with you.
Dwigbt - From what I've seen, many of your comments CAUSE confusion, and steer the body of Christ away from the clear meaning of scripture, rather than clarify it. How many times have I told you that you are muddying the waters of the clear meaning of passages? You do that a lot.
You seem frustrated that argument and debate continues and we don't just admit you're right and resolve to quit thinking for ourselves.
Dwight - And you seem frustrated that I am thinking for myself, but I do not come up with the same conclusions that you have.
I really am interested how folks see these verses.darinhouston wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 8:47 pmI'm curious how you see passages like 2 Peter 1:4 and Ephesians 3:19 in the context of this Colossians passage.Homer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 5:44 pmColossians 2:8-10
New Revised Standard Version
8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the universe, and not according to Christ. 9 For in him the whole fullness of deity (theotetos) dwells bodily, 10 and you have come to fullness in him, who is the head of every ruler and authority.
2 Peter 1:4 wrote: Through these things[q] he has bestowed on us his precious and most magnificent promises, so that by means of what was promised[r] you may become partakers of the divine natureWhat about 1 Corinthians 15:27-28 ?Ephesians 3:19 wrote: 19 and thus to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that you will be filled up to[a] all the fullness of God.
1 Corinthians 15:27-28 wrote: 27 For he “has put everything under his feet.”[a] Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28 When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.