kaleidescope atonement
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:22 pm
I've seen it referred to as the kaleidescope view of the atonement... the idea that there are a number of atonement metaphors in the Bible for good reason and that none of them should necessarily be seen as exclusive or even primary. Scot McKnight's book 'A Community Called Atonement' is pretty noteworthy in this regard (I just finished reading it).
Meanwhile, I'm working on a sermon series through the keywords of John 3:16 and I'm devoting the next 2 weeks to the words WORLD and GAVE. What is the problem with the world that necessitated the Father giving the son? I've decided to focus on 5 problems rather than just 1.
The problem(s) with the world
War- The world has been taken over by the oppressive regime of Satan
Outlaws- We have broken God's law
Relations- Humanity is divided, seemingly beyond repair
Leaders- Our leaders, over and over, fail us
Disconnect- We are cut off from the source of life
We see all these features in Genesis 3, it seems. The serpent attacked Eve and won (W). Adam & Eve broke the law (O). Adam & Eve covered themselves, were no longer as intimate (R). Adam failed to 'lead' Eve in the right path (L). They were removed from Eden and no longer had access to the tree of life (D).
And we see all these features again in John 3. There's the OT reference to the snake-bitten people (W). The idea that men love darkness (O). The fact that Nicodemus had to come in the cover of night (R). The fact that Nicodemus, a religious leader, didn't know basic truths (L) and, of course, the reference to our natural lack of access to eternal life outside of Jesus (D).
It seems to me the W problem is essentially the Christus Victor model of the atonment. Jesus resolves the problem by defeating the devil via the cross/resurrection. The O problem is addressed by the substitution/satisfaction models of the atonement. We are outlaws and justice should be done against us, but Jesus takes our place and/or satisfies justice. The R problem is broken relationships and is resolved by Christ's recapitulation of Adam's story. Jesus is Adam done right (and then some). The L problem (a lack of leadership) is resolved by the perfect life and example that Jesus gives us, especially in his demonstration of love via the cross (moral influence theory of atonement). The D problem, that we are cut off from the source of life, seems to lend itself to the seemingly broader recapitulation theory mentioned under R (indeed, McKnight thinks recapitulation is the 'bag' that can hold all these atonement metaphor clubs).
So Jesus defeated the devil, dealt with our sin, started a new family, demonstrated true love, and connected us to the source of life through His atoning incarnation, life, death, resurrection, and sending of the Spirit (McKnight is adamant that atonement isn't just about the cross).
I think this is right... and while some atonement theories may carry more weight than others, I do think there are elements of truth in all the major ones (Though some need some tweaking, I'm sure).
Meanwhile, I'm working on a sermon series through the keywords of John 3:16 and I'm devoting the next 2 weeks to the words WORLD and GAVE. What is the problem with the world that necessitated the Father giving the son? I've decided to focus on 5 problems rather than just 1.
The problem(s) with the world
War- The world has been taken over by the oppressive regime of Satan
Outlaws- We have broken God's law
Relations- Humanity is divided, seemingly beyond repair
Leaders- Our leaders, over and over, fail us
Disconnect- We are cut off from the source of life
We see all these features in Genesis 3, it seems. The serpent attacked Eve and won (W). Adam & Eve broke the law (O). Adam & Eve covered themselves, were no longer as intimate (R). Adam failed to 'lead' Eve in the right path (L). They were removed from Eden and no longer had access to the tree of life (D).
And we see all these features again in John 3. There's the OT reference to the snake-bitten people (W). The idea that men love darkness (O). The fact that Nicodemus had to come in the cover of night (R). The fact that Nicodemus, a religious leader, didn't know basic truths (L) and, of course, the reference to our natural lack of access to eternal life outside of Jesus (D).
It seems to me the W problem is essentially the Christus Victor model of the atonment. Jesus resolves the problem by defeating the devil via the cross/resurrection. The O problem is addressed by the substitution/satisfaction models of the atonement. We are outlaws and justice should be done against us, but Jesus takes our place and/or satisfies justice. The R problem is broken relationships and is resolved by Christ's recapitulation of Adam's story. Jesus is Adam done right (and then some). The L problem (a lack of leadership) is resolved by the perfect life and example that Jesus gives us, especially in his demonstration of love via the cross (moral influence theory of atonement). The D problem, that we are cut off from the source of life, seems to lend itself to the seemingly broader recapitulation theory mentioned under R (indeed, McKnight thinks recapitulation is the 'bag' that can hold all these atonement metaphor clubs).
So Jesus defeated the devil, dealt with our sin, started a new family, demonstrated true love, and connected us to the source of life through His atoning incarnation, life, death, resurrection, and sending of the Spirit (McKnight is adamant that atonement isn't just about the cross).
I think this is right... and while some atonement theories may carry more weight than others, I do think there are elements of truth in all the major ones (Though some need some tweaking, I'm sure).