The Length of the Amillennial Reign

End Times
dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by dwilkins » Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:38 pm

Paidion wrote:
Isaiah 25:8 (where God promises to swallow up death forever, something that I doubt people would stipulate an expected end to)
A different Hebrew word is used here, namely "netsach", which DOES mean forever.

The Septuagint reads quite differently:

"Death has prevailed and swallowed up [people]."
I'm fine with it being a different word than aionios. In fact, my point might be even stronger because it's not. These parallel passages talk about something that happens without no foreseeable end. This doesn't mean there is never and end of human history or physical creation. But, it does mean that nothing replaces this new paradigm that is being proposed.

Doug

Duncan
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by Duncan » Sun Aug 04, 2013 11:05 pm

Hey Doug, Revelation shows the same concept of the saints ruling forever.
Rev. 22:1 NASB Then he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, 2 in the middle of its street. On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. 3 There will no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and His bond-servants will serve Him; 4 they will see His face, and His name will be on their foreheads. 5 And there will no longer be any night; and they will not have need of the light of a lamp nor the light of the sun, because the Lord God will illumine them; and they will reign forever and ever.
As you know I argue that Daniel 7:21-22 shows the sequence of the millennium in reference to the second coming.
17 ‘These great beasts, which are four in number, are four kings who will arise from the earth. 18 But the saints of the Highest One will receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever, for all ages to come.
19 “Then I desired to know the exact meaning of the fourth beast, which was different from all the others, exceedingly dreadful, with its teeth of iron and its claws of bronze, and which devoured, crushed and trampled down the remainder with its feet, 20 and the meaning of the ten horns that were on its head and the other horn which came up, and before which three of them fell, namely, that horn which had eyes and a mouth uttering great boasts and which was larger in appearance than its associates. 21 I kept looking, and that horn was waging war with the saints and overpowering them 22 until the Ancient of Days came and judgment was passed in favor of the saints of the Highest One, and the time arrived when the saints took possession of the kingdom.
God defeats the little horn/beast (cf Rev. 19:11-21) and then the millennium begins as the saints possess the kingdom (cf. Rev. 20). Are you changing your paradigm on the millennium?

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by dwilkins » Sun Aug 04, 2013 11:44 pm

Duncan,

Maybe. I'm trying to work through the implications of the rule of the saints being forever (or at least indefinitely into the future past which the writers couldn't see).

There is no way that I can see that the reign of the saints begins in 30AD (or around the ministry of Christ), so traditional Amillennial timing (and Full Preterist timing) on the beginning of the reign of the saints cannot work. I think you have proven that conclusively.

But, Simmons cites some smart guys (Augustine, Wesley, Owens) who see the opposite of what I pointed out to the Full Preterists over the last year: There is no way you can have the reign of the saints parallel exactly with the detention of Satan. I pointed out to the Full Preterists that neither end of their system works. The traditional Amill solution as far as I've been able to find from Strimple, Hoekema, and Grenz is the stay vague and move on (though, to be fair, they may not have noticed the crisis). I'm considering the possibility that the traditional Amills are right about the timing of the start of the detention of Satan (~28-30AD, I lean towards the ascension; Full Preterism brought this in from traditional Amill but never considered the possibility that the reign of the saints won't work with it) and that you are right about the initiation of the reign of the saints, which as you just noted scripture says lasts forever. The wild card is the Gog/Magog issue. But, that's for another conversation, maybe.

Doug

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by Paidion » Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:11 am

How long will the saints reign with Christ? Are these verses perfectly consistent?

Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years. (Rev 20:6)

And night will be no more. They will need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they will reign forever and ever. (Rev 22:5)


How long will Christ reign? Are these verses perfectly consistent?

Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all. (I Cor. 15:24,25,28)

Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever.” (Rev 11:15)


What happens if we correctly translate the words in Revelation as "for ages and ages"? We have consistency.
What puzzles me is why some are so adamant in translating them as "for ever and ever"? Is it because it is the only way in which eternal conscious torment can be proved from other verses in Revelation?
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

Duncan
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by Duncan » Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:33 pm

The NT portrays Satan as quite active prior to AD 70--especially in the time right before AD 70 (cf. Dan. 7:21-22). I see him as cast out of heaven (unbound) to the earth at the cross.

THE DEMISE OF SATAN
Unlike full preterism, my position looks for a final end to evil in the future, at the end of the millennium; this will be when Satan is thrown into the lake of fire (Rev. 20:7-10). I see Scripture teaching the following sequence for the demise of Satan:

Satan was totally defeated at the cross (Matt. 28:18; Heb. 2:14); he was cast out of heaven at that time and had a short time loose on earth (John 12:31; Rev. 12:1-12). The kingdom of God was fully established in the heavenly realm at this time, but not yet fully in the earthly realm (Rev. 12:9-12). This was the already/not yet of the kingdom. This explains why Satan is depicted as being so active in the NT (1 Thess. 2:18; 2 Thess. 2:9; James 4:7; 1 Pet. 5:8, etc.). Thus, although “the works of the devil” were destroyed at the cross (1 John 3:8), the whole world was still “under the sway of the wicked one” prior to AD 70 (1 John 5:19). Satan was still allowed to be “the prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2:2), the “god” of the pre-AD 70 age (2 Cor. 4:4; cf. Luke 4:5-8). Scripture gives no hint of Satan being bound and in the abyss prior to AD 70.

After forty years—at the AD 70 end of “a time, times and half a time” (Rev. 12:14; cf. Dan. 7:25; 12:1-7)—Satan was bound in terms of his ability to deceive the nations (Rev. 19:11-20:4). At the AD 70 Second Coming the spiritual rulers of this world were brought down (Dan. 2:34-34, 44-45; 7:11-12; 1 Cor. 2:6; 15:20-28). This was when God fully implemented his great power—the full establishment of the kingdom of God (cf. Dan. 7:23-27; Rev. 11:15-18; cf. Luke 19:11-27). At the end of the millennium, Satan will be loosed from the abyss for a short time and then be disposed of in the lake of fire (Rev. 20:7-10), which is something still future to us.11 Thus, although Satan is totally defeated today, he is not yet disposed of. I believe we are currently in the time at the end of the millennium when Satan is loosed to deceive the nations. I discuss this in the final chapter (“Where Are We Now?”).

Full preterists say that Satan was cast into the lake of fire at AD 70. They have to say this; their paradigm demands it. If Satan was simply bound at that time, then there is still unfulfilled prophecy today (i.e., Rev. 20:7-10)—something unacceptable in the full preterist paradigm. Full preterists say that the only evil that exists today is the evil in men’s hearts (which continues in this world into eternity). They are in serious error on this point.

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by dwilkins » Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:33 pm

A similar problem might be what happens when the length of salvation provided by God turns out to only be for the age in question. What then?

Doug

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by dwilkins » Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:36 pm

Duncan wrote: Full preterists say that the only evil that exists today is the evil in men’s hearts (which continues in this world into eternity). They are in serious error on this point.
What part of that is the serious error? The fact that the only evil today is in men's hearts? Or, that this evil in men's hearts continues into eternity?

Doug

Duncan
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by Duncan » Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:42 pm

I think it is a serious error to say that evil continues into eternity. I also think it is way off base to say that Satan and satanic evil were totally disposed of at AD 70. It is driven much more by full preterism's need to wrap everything up by AD 70 then it is by what Scripture teaches. I would agrue that Dan. 7:9-12 shows satanic rulers (cf. Dan. 10:13, 20-21) being allowed into the post AD 70 kingdom age.

Singalphile
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:46 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by Singalphile » Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:44 pm

dwilkins asked:
Though John is the only one who used the term "thousand years", how important do you think it would be if the rest of Rev. 20 sounds strikingly similar to Daniel 7?
I don't know. I'll keep it in mind and keep reading ya'lls' thoughts for now.
... that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. John 5:23

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: The Length of the Amillennial Reign

Post by dwilkins » Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:59 pm

Singalphile wrote:
dwilkins asked:
Though John is the only one who used the term "thousand years", how important do you think it would be if the rest of Rev. 20 sounds strikingly similar to Daniel 7?
I don't know. I'll keep it in mind and keep reading ya'lls' thoughts for now.
The following is from Duncan's analysis (I don't know if someone pointed him to it):

If you take just the scene of the saints in Rev. 20 and overlay it with Daniel 7 I think you'll find that the whole of Rev. 20's scene of the saints seems to be one event in Daniel 7. In other words, we are used to seeing Rev. 20's saint material as two events (the seating of the saints and then the GWTJ). But, Daniel describes it as one event at the conclusion of the beast associated with Daniel. I trimmed some of the repetitious verses out, but I'd encourage anyone to go back and read the whole chapter slowly.

Daniel 7:1-28 (ESV)
[Introduction of the beats]
7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.
8 I considered the horns, and behold, there came up among them another horn, a little one, before which three of the first horns were plucked up by the roots. And behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things.
9 As I looked, thrones were placed, and the Ancient of days took his seat; his clothing was white as snow, and the hair of his head like pure wool; his throne was fiery flames; its wheels were burning fire.
10 A stream of fire issued and came out from before him; a thousand thousands served him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him; the court sat in judgment, and the books were opened.
11 I looked then because of the sound of the great words that the horn was speaking. And as I looked, the beast was killed, and its body destroyed and given over to be burned with fire.
17 'These four great beasts are four kings who shall arise out of the earth.
18 But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever, forever and ever.'
21 As I looked, this horn made war with the saints and prevailed over them,
22 until the Ancient of Days came, and judgment was given for the saints of the Most High, and the time came when the saints possessed the kingdom.
25 He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.
26 But the court shall sit in judgment, and his dominion shall be taken away, to be consumed and destroyed to the end.
27 And the kingdom and the dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High; their kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey them.'

Revelation 20:4-15 (ESV)
4 Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
5 The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years.
11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them.
12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done.
13 And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done.
14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
15 And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

My point above is that Revelation 20's judgment seen includes all of the elements of the single judgment scene in Daniel 7. That reign at begins seems parallel to me.

I took a look ever all 138 uses of derivatives of aionios tonight and it is clear that most of the time grammatically singular uses refer to a single age while plural ones refer to things we associate with forever (like how long salvation lasts, or how long God will live). In this case, the kingdom is associated with things that last as long as God lives, so I'd suggest this means longer than a single age.

If this is so, then I have a hard time seeing the Bible describe the saint's reign ending, which is required for both premillennialism and amillennialism.

(if you haven't already done so, I hope you'll download a handy interlinear tool called ISA. http://www.scripture4all.org/download/d ... _ISA20.php It's free. It makes doing such searches very easy).

Doug

Post Reply

Return to “Eschatology”