What does Jesus mean?

Right & Wrong
_samcllr
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:11 pm

Post by _samcllr » Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:20 am

dmatic wrote:It would seem that, though you probably won't admit it, you would allow adultery as long as a person did it without lust in his/her heart. Or that murder should be OK, as long as anger is not residing there. Don't you see how ridiculous it seems to ignore the commandments that still define God's heart and desire for us? There is nothing wrong with the commandments of God! They are righteous and good, yet you have demeaned them, and even called them untrue!
It does sound pretty ridiculous but I think it is you who are saying it. I'm pretty sure Paidion's train of thought was that Christ raised the bar for fulfilling the "true" meaning of the Law. Mainly because he said,
Paidion wrote:…but he is explaining THE DEEPER LAW and how it goes well beyond the Law of Moses
If Paidion is saying what I think he is saying, then it seems like you’ve introduced a straw man to knock down. If Christ is going beyond the Law of Moses, (which I see no problem with that statement) then Jesus is saying, “True…but” and not, “No… rather” which is how you have represented Paidion’s statements. It seems more ridiculous to think someone would gather that you can commit adultery without lust and murder without hate from Paidion’s post than to actually believe that way. So now you don’t have to be sad, bro. I don’t think any of the accolades came from people who believe that way either.

Even Paidion’s final statement is not false or misleading,
Paidion wrote:Notice that Jesus refers to what is to be obeyed as "these words of mine". He is not reiterating the Law given through Moses, but he is explaining THE DEEPER LAW and how it goes well beyond the Law of Moses. And it doesn't include those parts recorded in Leviticus and elsewhere about which foods to eat, what kinds of offerngs and sacrifices to make, which days to observe, new moons and Sabbaths, what to do if a fit of jealousy comes over a husband, etc. None of those things are part of THE TRUE LAW OF GOD.
Most of that is shown to be true in Colossians 3 but you could read Romans 14 and Hebrews 3 and 4 (specifically Heb. 4:3) and the fact that Jesus is said to have sat down after his priestly sacrifice in juxtaposition to the Levitical priests “standing” year after year in Hebrews 10:11-12 and that compared to Ephesians 2:6 to wrap up the Sabbaths part of Paidion’s post, and the jealousy of a husband part can be wrapped up in 1 Corinthians 7:15.

Everything he said in that passage appears to be true. I could be wrong but I’ve read the Bible through a number of times with the purpose of establishing the Biblical doctrine on this subject and I haven’t found anything contrary to his post. Do you suppose that you think by saying that we are free from the Law of Moses that it is discrediting the Law of Moses?

The New Testament never says that the Law was not glorious, but it does say that it has no glory in comparison to the Law of Christ which is written on the heart (2 Cor. 3:7-11) and Hebrews 8 even says that Jeremiah calling the New Covenant “New” suggests the Old Covenant (which included keeping the Law of it [Exodus 19:5]) was made obsolete and that it was fading. The passing of the Old Covenant with its priesthood can be marked in history and; “For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of Law also.” (Hebrews 7:12) This is not an insult to the Law and its commandments because Christ’s Covenant is so much more Glorious, so much so that the author of Hebrews calls the former commandments useless because they could not allow us to draw near to God (Heb. 7:18).

It seems that most Christians assume that if what we are everyday can’t be summed up in a single list of rules then our faith is relative and useless because we can’t hand that list of rules to someone so that they can follow them. But I think this is farthest from the truth. Jesus said that ‘the Spirit will lead us into all truth’ and that ‘we have one teacher’ and that ‘when fully trained a student can be like his teacher.’ Titus 2:11-12

“11 For the GRACE of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men,
12 INSTRUCTING us to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to live sensibly, righteously and godly in the present age,” (EMPHESIS mine)

Notice it doesn’t say “…instructing us to keep the Ten Commandments”. It’s not necessary. God is able to transform the man’s heart with out the Letter. So people should seek the Lord on their own and not another man and his interpretation of God’s word because what if that man is doing the things on the list and has followers seeking him and his interpretation of things but spiritually he is dead and his doctrine contains hid deadness in it but the people don’t know because they can see he keeps the rules on the list. This brings us back to what Jesus seems to be saying. He seen the Jews could argue that they were keeping the rules as they appear on the list, and decided to let them in on a little secret: “The Law is Spiritual, you are carnal. You haven’t gotten God on a technicality.” He could say this because, though the Covenant changed, the Israel of God was always the same people in the Old Testament and the New and that is, those who acted justly and loved mercy and walked humbly with God. Not a family of the flesh who went through the motions and vainly took upon themselves the name of God. That was just a secret (or mystery) until Jesus revealed it to his disciples. Remember, God said listen to Jesus instead of Moses and Elijah

Don’t be sad, Brother. The rest of scripture confirms this and you don’t have to feel bad that the Law of Moses isn’t receiving props as it once did. It was intended that this would happen in this way from the beginning.

In Jesus,
Sam
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_samcllr
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:11 pm

Post by _samcllr » Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:37 am

To the original poster, I believe that he is saying to people under the Law that it is only beneficial to keep the Law.

Maybe you should compare Matthew 5:19 to Matthew 11: 11 which says,
"Truly I say to you, among those born of women there has not arisen anyone greater than John the Baptist! Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.”

How is it that someone can be the greatest born among women and still be less than the least in the Kingdom of Heaven? Certainly John taught others to obey the Law and he was a Life-long Nazarite, how could he relax the Law.

What I think he is saying is that it is an honorable thing to keep the Law and teach others the same and will be acknowledged as such in the Kingdom of Heaven. Notice it says ..."will be <b>called</b> great" and "...will be <b>called</b> least" not "...will <b>be</b> great" or "will <b>be</b> least". I can't see anyone being in the Kingdom if they taught others to break the Law so I don't think Jesus is referring to political statuses of the Kingdom.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:44 pm

Sam wrote:
Even Paidion’s final statement is not false or misleading,

Paidion wrote:
Notice that Jesus refers to what is to be obeyed as "these words of mine". He is not reiterating the Law given through Moses, but he is explaining THE DEEPER LAW and how it goes well beyond the Law of Moses. And it doesn't include those parts recorded in Leviticus and elsewhere about which foods to eat, what kinds of offerngs and sacrifices to make, which days to observe, new moons and Sabbaths, what to do if a fit of jealousy comes over a husband, etc. None of those things are part of THE TRUE LAW OF GOD.
Sam, Thank you for your attempt to correct me. I do react to Paidion's last sentence, however, as false. These things, from Moses ARE a part of the true Law of God! that is the point I was trying to make, even though I didn't do a good job of it, apparently.

How can one say that the command to not commit adultery is not a part of the true law of God? This law is found in the commandments given by God to Moses. It is this thought that I am reacting to.

I agree that it is ridiculous to suggest that adultery, as long as it is done without lust in one's heart, is OK. I certainly, admit that Paidion would not think it proper, that's why i said that he wouldn't agree that that was what he was saying when he declares that the commandments given to Moses from God are not a part of His true law.

Sometimes, it helps to carry out our arguments to be able to see the ridiculousness of them.

What I say is that the Law of Moses IS a part of the true Law and teaching of God! I also say that Jesus upheld and taught the Law of God as given to Moses and magnified it and made it even more sharp and deep. I agree with Paidion that Jesus did this, but I don't agree with him, that Jesus taught people to not keep the commandments of His Father as given to Moses! Paidion is saying that Jesus did do this! Paidion is saying that Jesus said....don't worry about keeping those old commandments...just keep My commandments! But Jesus said the exact opposite! He said that those who broke even the least of those commandments given to Moses and the Prophets, and taught others to break even the least, that they would be called least in the kingdom of heaven. Paidion says that Jesus was not speaking about the commandments given to moses, when He was clearly referring to them, in the previous two verses.

Anyway, I'm still pondering this dilema. thanks for yoru concern.

Peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm

Homer wrote:dmatic,

Paidion is certainly capable of responding for himself, but I must say I find this statement of yours to be absurd:
I plan to find some commands, as given through Moses, and then ask you if they are still commands to be followed by us today. It would seem that, though you probably won't admit it, you would allow adultery as long as a person did it without lust in his/her heart. Or that murder should be OK, as long as anger is not residing there. Don't you see how ridiculous it seems to ignore the commandments that still define God's heart and desire for us? There is nothing wrong with the commandments of God! They are righteous and good, yet you have demeaned them, and even called them untrue!
You obviously do not know much about Paidion, in particular how he consistently advocates that we must live righteously before God!
Homer, Are you saying that I have misunderstood Paidion's post? I truly hope that he didn't mean what I perceived he meant. Do you think that there is something wrong with God's commandments as given to Moses too?

It seemd that Paidion, as well as most on this site, have taken the position that God's commandments as given to Moses have passed away, and are not to be kept any longer. I disagree with this position. My point in trying to show the ridiculousness of that position is to show its absurdity, by asking if adultery is Ok in your view, as long as lust is not present, or murder is OK as long as anger is not present. Obviously, it is absurd...but do you see that?

My position is that, yes...adultery is wrong. And so is lusting after a woman in your heart! Both are prohibited! Keeping them both (by neither lusting after a woman in one's heart, nor actually committing the act), is a good thing! Paidion said that the commandments as given to Moses are not a part of God's true Law! You do not take exception to that? I just think that that is an absurd position!

Impugning God's word is not acceptable to me. I'm sorry if that offends you.

Peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:30 pm

Sam wrote:
Remember, God said listen to Jesus instead of Moses and Elijah
Sam, could you show me where God said this?

My Bible doesn't contain the word "instead". Are you trying to add that word to God's?

Peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:40 pm

Sam also wrote:
It seems that most Christians assume that if what we are everyday can’t be summed up in a single list of rules then our faith is relative and useless because we can’t hand that list of rules to someone so that they can follow them. But I think this is farthest from the truth. Jesus said that ‘the Spirit will lead us into all truth’ and that ‘we have one teacher’ and that ‘when fully trained a student can be like his teacher.’ Titus 2:11-12

“11 For the GRACE of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men,
12 INSTRUCTING us to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to live sensibly, righteously and godly in the present age,” (EMPHESIS mine)

Notice it doesn’t say “…instructing us to keep the Ten Commandments”. It’s not necessary.
I'm not sure what has informed your "seeming" of what most christians do...but, are you suggesting that people shouldn't follow the Word of God? That they should follow "instead" the spirit? Now, following the Spirit is a wonderful thing! But, many follow deceiving spirits, and think they are in truth!
The grace of God is His Law. the grace of God is His teaching! His Way!

people would not know what godliness was unless God taught them! His teaching, shows us how to deny ungodliness, and to live righteously now in this present world! Following His teachings involve following His Law. His Spirit will guide us into all truth! this truth, is His word, and contains his commandments! Jesus prayed that we would be sanctified in truth! God's word is truth!

I'm not sure why you are disagreeing sam.

peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2618
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2618 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:42 pm

Sam wrote:
Remember, God said listen to Jesus instead of Moses and Elijah
dmatic wrote:
Sam, could you show me where God said this?

My Bible doesn't contain the word "instead". Are you trying to add that word to God's?
Since Christ is King and Emperor of the Kingdom of God, and since it is very possible that the transifiguration event on the mountain was the fulfillment to what Jesus said when He told the disciples that some of them some of them will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom, it necessarily follows that God's command to hear Him (the Son) is THE law of the kingdom for everyone who has been born into the Kingdom. This law is clearly contrasted with Moses and Elijah who were also present. This is what I percieve Sam to have meant. Just because the word "instead" is absent does not mean the message isn't. The bible is full of concepts that can be summed up with words that are not found in the bible, and you know this. :wink:
Last edited by Guest on Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:57 pm

Troy wrote:
Ths is law is clearly contrasted with Moses and Elijah who were also present. This is what I percieve Sam to have meant. Just because the word "instead" is absent does not mean the message isn't. The bible is full of concepts that can be summed up with words that are not found in the bible, and you know this.
I believe that the "message" is not in the text. Jesus, Himself, declared that we should listen to Moses and the Prophets! I believe that sam's message is wrong, and is NOT what God said! My belief is that we can, and should, listen to all of God's words!

peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:30 pm

dmatic,

Consider this:

Galatians 3
1. O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you that you should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified? 2. This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3. Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh? 4. Have you suffered so many things in vain—if indeed it was in vain?


Paul informs us here that the Spirit is received by faith. Obeying the law of Moses has no part in it. And works of the law are equated with the flesh.

5. Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?— 6. just as Abraham “believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” 7. Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. 8. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, “In you all the nations shall be blessed.” 9. So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.


The blessings we receive in Christ come by faith, not by doing the Law.

10. For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.” 11. But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.” 12. Yet the law is not of faith, but “the man who does them shall live by them.”


And here Paul asserts that the Law can only bring one thing: condemnation
- a curse. The Law can only condemn; it can not save.

13. Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”), 14. that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

Again, the blessing promised to us through Abraham has nothing to do with the Law of Moses.

15. Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man’s covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. 16. Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,”who is Christ. 17. And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect. 18. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise.


Paul makes the same point again!

19. What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator.


And here we see that the purpose of the Law ended when the "seed" came. After that time fully came, it had no further purpose.

20. Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one.
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. 22. But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23. But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. 24. Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25. But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.


"The law was our tutor". "We are no longer under a tutor". What is there about this that is difficult to understand? And Paul clearly informs us of the role of the Law. He says it was our "tutor", paidagogos in the Greek, and that for those in Christ, by faith, it has no purpose.

Strong's Number: 3807 paidagwgo/v
Original Word Word Origin
paidagwgo/v from (3816) and a reduplicated form of (71)
Transliterated Word Phonetic Spelling
Paidagogos pahee-dag-o-gos'
Parts of Speech TDNT
Noun Masculine 5:596,753
Definition
a tutor i.e. a guardian and guide of boys. Among the Greeks and the Romans the name was applied to trustworthy slaves who were charged with the duty of supervising the life and morals of boys belonging to the better class. The boys were not allowed so much as to step out of the house without them before arriving at the age of manhood.


26. For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

dmatic, think of it like this. A 2 year old child might, if he hits his eight year old sister, be told by his mom or dad "No! Don't hit your sister; that's bad!" He is not able to understand the concept of obligation to love his sister and act accordingly. Likewise under the Law of Moses, the people were not ready for the teachings of Jesus.

Jesus' statement in Matthew 5:18 is not as clear and easy of understanding as what Paul says here. It seems to me a good idea to interpret the less clear by the perspicuous statements in scripture.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

__id_2533
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2533 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:18 am

Thank you Homer, I will comment on your contribution later today, Lord willing, but before I do, will you try to define what you think Paul meant by "works of the law"? What do you think he was talking about? Do you think he was speaking about "obedience to the law"? Do you equate "work" with "obedience"? In other words, do you think a "work of the law" is to not murder, or to love God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength?
Also, are you aware of the concept that to "hear" as in faith comes by hearing, is to "heed and DO"? James reminded us to not be "hearers" only, thus deceiving ourselves, but to be doers too!

peace, dmatic
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “Ethics”