Interesting. I'd like to understand your viewpoint better. Can you provide some of the texts or evidences that brought you to this conclusion?Jesus was ahead of his time in his thinking about the structure of a society. Basically someone we call a genius.
This sparks two questions in my mind:However, when it comes to miracle performing, curing the sick, raising the dead, etc. well... extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and just because someone wrote about them in a book does not make those claims true.
1) It seems that billions of people have considered the available evidence to be sufficient to accept the claims of Jesus. What would you consider to be acceptable evidence?
2) I agree with you that someone writing about Jesus in a book doesn't make their claims true, but it also doesn't necessarily make their claims false. It simply puts their claims out there in the public realm. How did you determine that the claims made in the New Testament about Jesus (the resurrection, for example) were false?