dmatic wrote:
the Hebrews passage is discussing the priestood of Jesus, and how this can be since no mention of priests coming from the tribe of Judah is made in Moses. This can be because of the transference of the priesthood, from the Levitical priesthood, to the Melchizedek priesthood, as was also prophesied in the TeNaKh. the word translated as "change" is # 3331 and #3346 in the Greek, from Strong's. It signifies a transfer from one to another.
First, it states that the Melchizedek priesthood is unchangeable (and therefore not liable to pass to a successor). And since it predated the Levitical priesthood, it didn't transfer to them to be transferred to Jesus. It's not transferable. The tabernacle was a copy and a shadow of heavenly things. That's why it could never take away sins. It was a teaching device, not means to remove sins.
Second, since the Levitical priesthood was part of the Law of Moses and has been done away with by the new covenant, your assertion (based on a misunderstanding of what Jesus said) that not one jot or tittle can pass from the law is incorrect.
The transfer is our obedience from one covenant to the other.
dmatic wrote:
This is also why David was not guilty for eating the showbread, when Jesus was asking the Pharisees about it. David was a Melchizedek guy!
Jesus said he was guilty:
Mat 12:3 But He said to them, "Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him:
Mat 12:4 how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests?
Are you saying that we, like David can now break the law and be blameless!

Jesus said David broke the law.
David was not a "Melchizedek guy". The Melchizedek priesthood does not transfer (Heb 7:24). Jesus is Melchizedek. Jesus is the one without "beginning of days nor end of life" (Heb 7:3).
dmatic wrote:
To your other question in the post, I have already answered this objection before. The council did not deceide against Christ. They agreed that the converting Gentiles would learn the law of Moses every sabbath when they came to the synagogue to hear Moses read. (Acts 15:21) They confirmed their acceptance of the Gentile converts as brothers, and gave them the four laws from Moses, not from the so-called Noahide laws you suggest, to get them started, saying that if they kept these four things in mind as they conformed their lives to Moses' teaching that they would do well. This greatly encouraged the coverting Gentiles, in that they did not need to become circumcised as adults in order to keep the Law of moses.
hope this helps.
peace, dmatic
Sorry but that's not what the text states. Try to exegete the passage and not read into it your ideas of what you think it should say.
Heb 7:18 For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness,
Heb 7:19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.
The former commandment (from the Law of Moses) was annulled. May jots and tittles passed! Admit the truth, it will make you free.
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)