Well said! And many are the speculations they come up with.This might seem pretty accurate as far as it goes, but the logical and philosophical conclusions of men can only take us so far, and this still leaves many questions.
Why not just go with what the inspired Apostle said; it ought to be good enough:
John 1:1-14 (New King James Version)
1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2. He was in the beginning with God. 3. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
6. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7. This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. 8. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world.
10. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. 11. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. 12. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
If Jesus was the Son before He was begotten of the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary, you would think John or some other Apostle would mention it. He, and they, did not. John expressly informs us He was The Word; how much does it help us to go beyond this, where the scriptures have not gone?