How, exactly?Frank wrote:Evangelion, It will do wonders for the dialogue!
He is more likely to be persuaded by a polite, rational, logical dialogue on the issue of external support for Biblical claims. He is less likely to be persuaded if you simply call him a fool. He needs a reason to believe in God; that's the starting point.Hopefully the atheist will come to realize there is a God and the Christian will not continue to cater to such foolishness. What fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? This fellow has heard nearly everything over and over but has he ever been boldly told the truth about himself. I am sure he is forever hearing but never coming to the knowledge of truth. Sixteen years, He claims.
So what? Give the guy a little time.I asked Him in a previous post what does being a christian meen to him, and no response. He also stated that he was a christian before he was an athiest and I asked him how that was so and he has not responded yet.
He probably feels the same way about you!He gets off on these strange beliefs and things that has no relevence what so ever to life and the reality of it.

I don't object so much to what you said, but the way in which you said it.I am glad someone told him the reality of his life. The reality of it all is that with out belief in God and Jesus his Son, this man will perish and God is not willing and neither am I that he should perish and I hope he comes to repentence.
Why is it , you are quick to rebuke a brother over truth but will not rebuke an athiest who says their is no God?
And I wouldn't call us "brothers"; I suspect that our theology is mutually exclusive.