Our craving for bad food as evidence for the fall
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:53 pm
Steve had a caller yesterday that noted that we crave food that is unhealthy, and asked if this could be used as evidence against evolution and support the creation/fall theory.
I don't think it would be a fruitful argument just because if anything, I think the concept supports evolution more than creation (I believe we have been micro evolving since the fall anyway and that our genetic code is quite able to adapt in order to survive so for me it is sort of a moot point but it won't help in an argument against a naturalist)
Here is a simplified argument for how this phenomenon supports evolution
In the wild high calorie and sugary foods are extremely rare but they provide lots of store-able energy. For thousands of years these kinds of foods have been difficult to come by. Our bodies have evolved a desire to eat these foods because we have very rarely had access to them and it was in our best interest to eat them whenever we could. Our bodies haven't had time to adjust to the relatively new phenomenon of easy access to sugary fatty foods. Wait another thousand years perhaps, and things might change. Humans eat far more food than their bodies need to operate. When you don't know when you will be able to eat next, it is in your best interest to eat as much as possible, but when you are as capable as we are, and are living in peaceful plentiful times, (something that has been comparatively very rare in the animal kingdom and throughout the history of mankind) it is not wise to eat as much as you can. Our bodily urges are still in animal survival mode and haven't realized that society has made life so easy for us.
I would also point out, contrary to what was discussed in yesterdays show, animals that have similar digestive systems to humans (omnivorous mammals) typically do like our high processed fatty and sugary foods. most of these foods are ok for them and give them needed calories if they eat them sparingly. This is why when you go camping, even in the middle of nowhere, you need to put your food up at night.
I don't think it would be a fruitful argument just because if anything, I think the concept supports evolution more than creation (I believe we have been micro evolving since the fall anyway and that our genetic code is quite able to adapt in order to survive so for me it is sort of a moot point but it won't help in an argument against a naturalist)
Here is a simplified argument for how this phenomenon supports evolution
In the wild high calorie and sugary foods are extremely rare but they provide lots of store-able energy. For thousands of years these kinds of foods have been difficult to come by. Our bodies have evolved a desire to eat these foods because we have very rarely had access to them and it was in our best interest to eat them whenever we could. Our bodies haven't had time to adjust to the relatively new phenomenon of easy access to sugary fatty foods. Wait another thousand years perhaps, and things might change. Humans eat far more food than their bodies need to operate. When you don't know when you will be able to eat next, it is in your best interest to eat as much as possible, but when you are as capable as we are, and are living in peaceful plentiful times, (something that has been comparatively very rare in the animal kingdom and throughout the history of mankind) it is not wise to eat as much as you can. Our bodily urges are still in animal survival mode and haven't realized that society has made life so easy for us.
I would also point out, contrary to what was discussed in yesterdays show, animals that have similar digestive systems to humans (omnivorous mammals) typically do like our high processed fatty and sugary foods. most of these foods are ok for them and give them needed calories if they eat them sparingly. This is why when you go camping, even in the middle of nowhere, you need to put your food up at night.