Response to Steve Gregg's article-Is Tithing For Christians?

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Mon May 01, 2006 11:03 am

Now, each of us is the temple
It is my understanding that although we are each a temple (sanctuary) of the Holy Spirit, we (the church) are corporately the temple of God. This Paul's metaphor in 1 Cor. 3:5-17 plainly indicates. Also Peter uses the same metaphor, 1 Peter 2:5; "you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house......". Paul again affirms this same idea in Ephesians 2:19-22; "in whom you also are buing built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit".

If the Temple under the law was a figure for the church, the body of Christ, and the tithes were brought to the temple, would this not imply giving to the church (corporately)?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Mon May 01, 2006 11:54 am

Homer wrote:
Now, each of us is the temple
It is my understanding that although we are each a temple (sanctuary) of the Holy Spirit, we (the church) are corporately the temple of God. This Paul's metaphor in 1 Cor. 3:5-17 plainly indicates. Also Peter uses the same metaphor, 1 Peter 2:5; "you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house......". Paul again affirms this same idea in Ephesians 2:19-22; "in whom you also are buing built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit".

If the Temple under the law was a figure for the church, the body of Christ, and the tithes were brought to the temple, would this not imply giving to the church (corporately)?
Good call, Homer
:D
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Mon May 01, 2006 4:48 pm

AARONDISNEY wrote:Once again, mort, you make it all about the Levites. Why do you insist that it is only a "law" thing. Was Abraham under the law, was Jacob under the law. Did the Lord say that all the tithes belong to the Levites or did he say they all belong to Him?
27:30
And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land, or of the fruit of the tree, is the LORD's: it is holy unto the LORD.

You have to convince me that the Levites were the only ones that were supposed to receive tithes before I believe your opinion.

7:8 - 10
And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth.
And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham.
For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.

So if the tithe was given to the Lord prior to the Levitical priesthood, you can't simply tie it to that and now that it's gone - so is the tithe.
Jesus is still receiving the tithe, He does so through His body, the Church.

If you wish to convince me, making it all about the Levites will not fly, you are leaving important parts out of the equation, since it precedes the Levitical priesthood.
Aaron,
I understand the point you are making. However, I tried to point out in previous posts that animal sacrifices also preceeded the law and were never expressly repealed. The purpose of animal sacrifices were/are explained but that is a far cry from repealing them.

I'm simply making this point. Animal sacrifices, circumcision, tithing and (some say) Sabbath keeping all preceed the law. Yet none of them are required of the Christian except you would say the tithe.

Your argument falls short in proving how all these other important and Godly pre-law things (except the tithe, you would say) have been fulfilled and are not a means today of justifying the Christian.

So just by saying they pre-date the mozaic law, doesn't mean they are still required. We no longer feel it a command of God to do no labor on the Sabbath, to circumcise ourselves or offer animal sacrifices. Even though they are not repealed. Even though Paul said circumcision means nothing, he had Timothy circumcised! An Paul kept other Jewish customs.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Mon May 01, 2006 4:54 pm

AARONDISNEY wrote:
Homer wrote:
Now, each of us is the temple
It is my understanding that although we are each a temple (sanctuary) of the Holy Spirit, we (the church) are corporately the temple of God. This Paul's metaphor in 1 Cor. 3:5-17 plainly indicates. Also Peter uses the same metaphor, 1 Peter 2:5; "you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house......". Paul again affirms this same idea in Ephesians 2:19-22; "in whom you also are buing built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit".

If the Temple under the law was a figure for the church, the body of Christ, and the tithes were brought to the temple, would this not imply giving to the church (corporately)?
Good call, Homer
:D
If you agree with this statement, then why would we give to our "local church" if the money is to stay in that church and be used only to the benefit of "it's members". If we are all the temple (as I agree we are) then why don't we do what Paul did. Collect money and take it to the needy in other churches like the katrina victims. Not "build bigger barns" for "us" in "our church" while other members of the same body suffer.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

_livingink
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:54 pm

Post by _livingink » Mon May 01, 2006 8:14 pm

AARONDISNEY,

If Abraham did, in fact, pay tithes after the encounter with Melchizedek, to whom did he pay them? Please provide the scripture reference.

livingink
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Mort_Coyle
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by _Mort_Coyle » Mon May 01, 2006 8:38 pm

Hi Homer, Aaron & Sean,

Sean,

You took the words right out of my mouth, er... fingers.

Homer,

Paul (and Peter) did indeed also apply the temple metaphor to the gathering of believers (the ekklesia, or church) as well as the individual believer. If you look at the context of the use of the metaphor though, it pertains to the indwelling of God. This is beautifully illustrated in the Pentecost story in Acts 2 where the manifest presence of God returns, not to the temple as anticipated by the Jews, but to the believers gathered together in one place.

I think one must be careful about applying this metaphor beyond it's obvious context. To do so is to read something into the text that isn't there.

However, even if one did stretch the metaphor to accomodate the application of Levitical tithing laws to the New Testament church, all that would yield is, as Sean said, giving to one-another within the church. One doesn't need to misappropriate the metaphor to see that that is the type of giving shown in the New Testament.

Aaron,

I would challenge you to do a study on giving in the New Testament. Here are some scripture references to get you started:
Matt. 19:21, 25:34-40, Luke 12:33, 14:13-14, 18:22, 19:8, Acts 2:44-45, 4:34-35, 9:36, 10:31, 24:17, Romans 15:26, 1 Cor 13:3, Gal 2:10, 1 Tim 5:3-4, 5:16, James 1:27. This is just a sampling, and what they all have in common is that the recipient of the giving is the poor.

I need to take you to task on a few other points:
Once again, mort, you make it all about the Levites. Why do you insist that it is only a "law" thing. Was Abraham under the law, was Jacob under the law.
I've already addressed the point about Abraham (which also applies to Jacob), as have others. I also provided you a link for more in-depth reading. Tithing (aka paying tributes) was a common practice in the ancient Middle-East. For example, A. H. Sayce, the famed Professor of Assyriology at Oxford, wrote the following:
"This offering of tithes was no new thing. In his Babylonian home Abram must have been familiar with the practice. The cuneiform inscriptions of Babylonia contain frequent references to it. It went back to the pre-Semitic age of Chaldaea, and the great temples of Babylonia were largely supported by the esra or tithe which was levied upon prince and peasant alike. That the god should receive a tenth of the good things which, it was believed, he had bestowed upon mankind was not considered to be asking too much. There are many tablets in the British Museum which are receipts for the payment of the tithe to the great temple of the sun-god at Sippara, in the time of Nebuchadnezzar and his successors. From one of them we learn that Belshazzar, even at the very moment when the Babylonian empire was falling from his father's hands, nevertheless found an opportunity for paying the tithe due from his sister." (Patriarchal Religion, p. 175)
It's worth pointing out that most city-states of that time were theocratic in some form or other. Tithes, tributes and taxes were often one and the same. Abram's tithe (and Jacob's) was a typical cultural practice and applied to both deities and rulers (often considered one and the same by pagans). It's generally regarded by historians that the Israelites adopted this practice from the Canaanites and incorporated it. Or, you could say that God applied this well-known practice to the Levitical system. So obviously the concept of tithing pre-dates the Levites and was practiced throughout the pagan cultures of the ancient Middle-East.

Now, I've asked you a number of questions which you have not addressed. I'll repeat them:

1. Please provide an example from the New Testament where the tithe is given to the church. (I'm not referring to just giving, but to the tithe as described in Levitical law).

2. Show me the scriptures that allow you to transfer the tithe from the temple system onto the New Testament church.

3. If your basis is simply that nowhere is the tithe explicitly revoked in the New Testament then I must ask how many of the other Levitical laws do you still keep? For example, do you make sure not to wear two different types of fabric at once? (Lev 19:19)

4. So then, on what basis do you support your view of the tithe? After all, you might lay out a great case using nothing but scripture and still be wrong about it. Is your basis "hearing the Lord"? Lots of cults have been started by people who claimed to hear God (but contradicted scripture). Is your basis the teachings of your pastor? Paul's commendation of the Bereans would seem to indicate that you have a responsibility to search the scriptures to see if what you are taught is Biblical. So I ask again, on what basis do you support your view of the tithe?

The bottom line is this: The entire system and covenant that the tithes were a part of was fulfilled in Christ 2,000 years ago.

If you go through the scriptures I listed earlier in this post you will see that the giving in the New Testament church is nowhere described as a "tithe" and was directed towards helping the needy within the church, helping struggling churches in other cities (such as the Corinthians collecting funds to send to the Jerusalem church, which was experiencing poverty and oppression) and sometimes supporting missionaries (such as the Philippians supporting Paul while he was under house-arrest in Rome). Offerings were not used to pay for buildings or minister’s salaries. Paul was adamant about working with his own hands and not taking money from those he was ministering to (1 Cor. 9, 2 Cor. 6, 2 Cor. 11, 2 Thess. 3). Paul used the money he earned from making tents to meet his own needs and those of his companions.

The giving that we see in the New Testament seems quite different from the method of giving that is typically taught in churches today (and referred to as “tithing”). In fact, the practice of tithing that is taught in Evangelical churches today bears no resemblance to how the early church gave (or, for that matter, to the tithing of the Old Testament Israelites). So where did this practice come from? According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia (vol. XIV, pp. 174-175):
"The early Church had no tithing system. The tithes of the Old Testament were regarded as abrogated [abolished] by the law of Christ.... But as the Church expanded and its material needs grew more numerous and complex, it became necessary to adopt a definite rule to which people could be held either by a sense of moral obligation or by a precept of positive law. The tithing of the Old Law provided an obvious model, and it began to be taught.... The Council of Macon in 585 ordered payment of tithes and threatened excommunication to those who refused to comply."
And according to the Encyclopaedia Americana:
"It (tithing) was not practised in the early Christian church but gradually became common (in the Roman Catholic church in western Europe) by the 6th Century. The Council of Tours in 567 and the 2nd Council of Macon in 585 advocated tithing. Made obligatory by civil law in the Carolingian empire in 765 and in England in the 10th Century...
So the form of tithing that you are advocating is actually a tradition instituted by the Catholic church in the 6th century.

In a typical modern-day Evangelical church, 85% of the tithes collected are used to pay for the building and pastoral salaries. The other 15% is divvied up for donuts, coffee, office supplies, advertising, etc. The percentage that actually goes to the poor is miniscule. You tell me, does this accurately reflect the value that God places upon the poor?

If you really wanted to bring yourself into literal obedience to Malachi 3, here’s what you'll would need to do:

1. Move to Israel and buy a farm.
2. Find some Levites to support.
3. Begin observing the Old Testament festivals (including animal sacrifices).
4. Bring 20% of your crops and herds to the temple in Jerusalem (a real challenge since the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed 2000 years ago!)

If you successfully complete steps 1 through 4, you might then be able to claim that you were practicing Biblical tithing.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Tue May 02, 2006 3:40 am

Another way to look at it is this statement by Jesus:

Matt 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you

I'm not commanded to observe anything other than what Christ commanded. He did not command a tithe, but more than that (100% offering to God, not 10%).

Isn't that simple enough?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Tue May 02, 2006 5:28 am

THere's like 4 or 5 of you and only one of me so I won't even come close to answering every objection to my points.

You say that animals sacrifices preceded the law and are now no longer needed but never said to need to end. I would see that since Heb 9 and 10 states that they are wothless in light of the true sacrifice that they should end.

You also say that the NT never says anything to us to continue the tithe. I am honestly curious to what you think that this verse means.........

Heb 7:8
8 And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth.
(KJV)

I've really not looked deeply into it, and am honestly wanting to know what your thoughts are on the meaning of Jesus still receiving tithes from there.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Tue May 02, 2006 11:32 am

Sean wrote:
AARONDISNEY wrote:
Homer wrote: It is my understanding that although we are each a temple (sanctuary) of the Holy Spirit, we (the church) are corporately the temple of God. This Paul's metaphor in 1 Cor. 3:5-17 plainly indicates. Also Peter uses the same metaphor, 1 Peter 2:5; "you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house......". Paul again affirms this same idea in Ephesians 2:19-22; "in whom you also are buing built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit".

If the Temple under the law was a figure for the church, the body of Christ, and the tithes were brought to the temple, would this not imply giving to the church (corporately)?
Good call, Homer
:D
If you agree with this statement, then why would we give to our "local church" if the money is to stay in that church and be used only to the benefit of "it's members". If we are all the temple (as I agree we are) then why don't we do what Paul did. Collect money and take it to the needy in other churches like the katrina victims. Not "build bigger barns" for "us" in "our church" while other members of the same body suffer.
Please answer my above post if you are reading this, I didn't want that one to go unnoticed but I did want to say something here.

I don't know how every church does it, but our tithes generally go to our main headquarters where they are allocated where needed. But our offerings very often do go to other churches or other people that need it. We take up offerings for people outside of our circle at least twice a month. I can't speak for how everyone does things but we definitely don't hoard out offerings for ourselves.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Tue May 02, 2006 3:49 pm

AARONDISNEY wrote: You say that animals sacrifices preceded the law and are now no longer needed but never said to need to end. I would see that since Heb 9 and 10 states that they are wothless in light of the true sacrifice that they should end.
And I would say that since Paul said 'no one will be declared righteous by observing the law'. And 'You who are seeking to be justified by law have been estranged from Christ and have fallen away from Grace' then we are no longer under the give a tenth part law. You have continuously quoted Malachi 3 to make your point. Yet Malachi 3 refers to the blessings and cursings of the law that applies to natural Israel. We are not under the law, so Malachi 3 does not apply to the Christian. Christians are to observe all things Christ commanded. Christ did not command a tithe. He commanded more than that. To give all of ourselves to the lord.
AARONDISNEY wrote: You also say that the NT never says anything to us to continue the tithe. I am honestly curious to what you think that this verse means.........

Heb 7:8
8 And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth.
(KJV)

I've really not looked deeply into it, and am honestly wanting to know what your thoughts are on the meaning of Jesus still receiving tithes from there.
I honestly don't know what you think Hebrews 7:8 means.

"And here men that die receive tithes" refers to the levites, who being mortal men die. "but there he [receiveth them], of whom it is witnessed that he liveth" refers to Jesus and is explained in the next verses:

Heb 7:9 And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham.
10 For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.

One thing that has already been mentioned that you didn't comment on was:

Heb 7:1 For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;
Heb 7:2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;

Abraham gave a tenth of all the spoils from the slaughter of the kings. This "slaughter of the kings' event only happened once. So how is it that you say it happned more than once?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”