Rob Bell: Universalist?

User avatar
steve
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:45 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by steve » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:27 pm

Hi Todd,

As I have noted before, I have a hard time finding exegetical warrant for your position. For example, you write:
Some examples of the consequences for sin are: guilt, shame, condemnation, fear, anxiety, distrust, disgrace, being shunned, broken relationships, imprisonment, and pre-mature death.
That these consequences often accompany a life of sin is obviously true, though many of them do not occur even to some of the greatest sinners. Whenever the Bible speaks of sin's penalty, it always identifies the consequence as "death." You mention "pre-mature death" in your list, but it is clear that many great sinners do not die prematurely.

Also, many of the consequences you list are experienced by good people as well as evil ones. The suggestion that people get what they deserve in this life is contrary to many affirmations in the wisdom literature of the Bible (e.g. Psalms, Ecclesiastes and, especially, Job). I can't find support for the "punishment-is-entirely-in-this-life" position, either in scripture nor in reality. How do you justify it exegetically?

I don't mean, "How do you harmonize such a predetermined assumption with the seemingly hostile witness of many passages?" but, rather, "How do you arrive at this position as the view demanded by the best exegetical treatment of all passages of the Bible?" That is, which passages, properly exegeted, positively teach this limitation on judgment to the present lifetime?

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by Paidion » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:05 pm

We happen to have a video of Rob Bell preaching on the theme "the gods are not angry". He doesn't believe that God can be appeased by offering Him any sacrifices. Not even the sacrifice of Christ appeased Him. I do not think Bell is a universalist. He speaks of "the reconciliation of all things" but he doesn't seem to understand this in a universalist sense. He believes that when Jesus sacrificed Himself on the cross all things were reconciled to Him and God. I understood him to mean potentially. I may be wrong in my understanding. For he does seem to suggest that this is the good news, and that there is nothing we can do except rejoice and be thankful that Christ has made possible this reconciliation of all things to God.
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
kaufmannphillips
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:00 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by kaufmannphillips » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:52 pm

Homer wrote:

Interesting link re Rob Bell:

http://www.ordinarypastor.com/?p=1283
:arrow: Further from the same source:

http://www.ordinarypastor.com/?p=6538

So here we have another quick-draw artist, taking potshots before the balance of evidence has come out.


(Elsewhere on his site, the “ordinary pastor” describes himself as “truly the worst sinner I know.”

Now, if he genuinely considers himself to be the worst sinner out of everybody he knows, perhaps he should consider spending a bit less time church planting, and/or railing against the perceived shortcomings of others on his blog, and a bit more time focusing on his personal repentance. :| )



:arrow: In the article that Homer linked, the writer states: If J. Gresham Machen were alive today, I suspect he would do what he did with Bell’s theological predecessors. Machen would remind him that while he has the freedom to start a new religion, he really should call it something other than Christian given that his religion does not resemble what Christ actually established as recorded in the Christian book, the Bible.

If J. Gresham Machen were alive today, I wonder what sort of headway he would be making amongst the spiritually needy in America. For better or for worse, many unchurched Americans in the present day would choke on or stumble over the theology of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. But then again, if one is an OPC Calvinist, I guess there's no urgent need to be considerate toward the sensibilities of the unchurched; God will pull the strings and work the levers of the universe to save exactly whom he will, regardless :| .

Now, I have only read a smidgen of Velvet Elvis, the book which the writer reviewed. But within that smidgen, Bell states: "For thousands of years followers of Jesus, like artists, have understood that we have to keep going, exploring what it means to live in harmony with God and each other. The Christian faith tradition is filled with change and growth and transformation. Jesus took part in this process by calling people to rethink faith and the Bible and hope and love and everything else, and by inviting them into the endless process of working out how to live as God created us to live.

The challenge for Christians then is to live with great passion and conviction, remaining open and flexible, aware that this life is not the last painting.

Times change. God doesn't, but times do. We learn and grow, and the world around us shifts, and the Christian faith is alive only when it is listening, morphing, innovating, letting go of whatever has gotten in the way of Jesus and embracing whatever will help us be more and more the people God wants us to be.
"

A living religion is ever a new thing. And one may ask: considering the depictions in the NT gospels, was Jesus’ eminent priority to establish a religion of record? Or was it to catalyze a dynamic faith, which the biblical record helps open up to discovery?
========================
"The more something is repeated, the more it becomes an unexamined truth...." (Nicholas Thompson)
========================

User avatar
Homer
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by Homer » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:52 am

Hi Kaufmannphillips,

So it was interesting. And I am not a Calvinist.

User avatar
Ian
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:26 am

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by Ian » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:57 am

Paidion, you wrote:
Not even the sacrifice of Christ appeased Him.
I know you don`t throw around words carelessly. So could you expand further, please?

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by Paidion » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:41 pm

Paidion: Not even the sacrifice of Christ appeased Him.

Ian : I know you don`t throw around words carelessly. So could you expand further, please?

Paidion: Hi Ian. I began writing a work with the title below. I have written three chapters and still have not completed it. I posted these chapters on the old forum. Chapter Three may be accessed by clicking the link below. If you are interested, you can also access Chapter One from the same area. It isn't called Chapter One, but it is found in a thread with the same title as below:

The Supreme Sacrifice of Jesus Christ
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

rae
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by rae » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:24 pm

Apparently this guy has read the book and has done a pretty thorough review on it with lots of quotes. http://www.challies.com/book-reviews/lo ... s-new-book

It has been very interesting to read all of the comments that I've seen on Facebook and Twitter about the book. I would say I'm personally pretty convinced of Conditional Immortality, but it seems that the only discussion I've seen on the issue has been between the ECT view and UR (and it looks like UR is the direction that Rob is heading towards).

I'm wondering if the majority of Christians don't even realize that there's a third option to consider too.

User avatar
Todd
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:09 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by Todd » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:38 pm

steve wrote:Whenever the Bible speaks of sin's penalty, it always identifies the consequence as "death."
Yes, but is this physical death, annihilation, or perhaps spiritual death? I believe it is speaking of spiritual death which occurs while one is still living.

1 Tim 5:6
But she who lives in pleasure is dead while she lives.

Eph 2:1
And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins,

The consequences that I listed are some of the symptoms which accompany spiritual death (which is the wages of sin).
steve wrote:You mention "pre-mature death" in your list, but it is clear that many great sinners do not die prematurely.
Yes, no doubt this is true, but it is also possible that God could exercise judgment upon someone which puts him in great distress, but this distress might not be outwardly obvious to others.
steve wrote:Also, many of the consequences you list are experienced by good people as well as evil ones.
It is true that many good people suffer in this life either because of an act of nature (floods, earthquakes, disease), or as a result of someone else's sin. This has been and will continue to be a fact of life. But is is also true that a righteous man can sleep well at night in peaceful slumber, while the evil doer can't find rest for his soul.
steve wrote:The suggestion that people get what they deserve in this life is contrary to many affirmations in the wisdom literature of the Bible (e.g. Psalms, Ecclesiastes and, especially, Job). I can't find support for the "punishment-is-entirely-in-this-life" position, either in scripture nor in reality. How do you justify it exegetically?
Gal 6:7
Be not deceived ; God is not mocked : for whatsoever a man soweth , that shall he also reap

I believe this is a true statement. It does not specify when or how he reaps what he sows, but we have confidence that he does. Paul speaks of "tribulation and anguish" for the evil doers. Is this before death or after? I do not find any plain scriptures which positively support post-death punishment.
steve wrote:I don't mean, "How do you harmonize such a predetermined assumption with the seemingly hostile witness of many passages?" but, rather, "How do you arrive at this position as the view demanded by the best exegetical treatment of all passages of the Bible?" That is, which passages, properly exegeted, positively teach this limitation on judgment to the present lifetime?
Giving a complete answer to this question would require a book. So I will suggest one for you to read. It is available on line for free.

An Examination of the Doctrine of Future Retribution, Hosea Ballou

http://books.google.com/books?id=yIAfAA ... &q&f=false

I didn't intend to hijack this thread, but I wanted to give at least a brief answer to Steve's questions, although I am sure my answers are inadequate. I finish with this quote.
Aaron wrote:Sin, as I think you'd agree, is mankind's enemy. But it's not the last enemy, for Paul tells us that death is the last enemy. If that's so, then when everyone is raised immortal and death is abolished, sin will have already been taken care of - which means those who are raised from the dead will be sinless. Paul even implies this when, in view of this "last enemy" being "destroyed," he asked rhetorically, "Oh death, where is your sting?" Since he identifies sin as "the sting of death," it is implied that sin will be absent from humanity after all are made immortal (1 Cor 15:54-57).
Todd

User avatar
kaufmannphillips
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:00 pm

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by kaufmannphillips » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:02 pm

Homer wrote:
Hi Kaufmannphillips,

So it was interesting. And I am not a Calvinist.
Machen was a Calvinist, and a founder of what is now called the OPC. The "ordinary pastor" is also a Calvinist.


Here's another recent selection from our "ordinary pastor." He wraps up by saying, "For a good review of Rob Bell’s book, see Tim Challies here."

But how can the "ordinary pastor" tell whether the review is "good" or not, without having read the book himself? It's not being released until next Tuesday, and if the "ordinary pastor" had obtained an advance copy, the readers of his blog probably would have heard about it.
========================
"The more something is repeated, the more it becomes an unexamined truth...." (Nicholas Thompson)
========================

User avatar
RickC
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:55 am
Location: Piqua, Ohio

Re: Rob Bell: Universalist?

Post by RickC » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:40 am

Rob Bell is streaming live Mon, 14 Mar 2011 @ 7PM (EST).

For details: https://www.robbell.com/

yw ;)
Last edited by RickC on Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply

Return to “Views of Hell”