I while back I found a nice copy of Bell's "Love Wins" at one of my favorite book stores (Goodwill or St. Vinnie's, can't remember). Anyway, after reading the book I concluded it isn't quite fair to count Bell as a universalist. While he said things that would leave that impression, he never clearly said so as far as I could see. He did redefine hell as something you make for yourself, so I suppose he could be a "no-heller" when considered in regard to more traditional views of hell.
I'm curious if in his other writings or sermons if he has unambiguously put himself in the universalist camp.
Rob Bell on Hell
Re: Rob Bell on Hell
I don't think he un-ambiguously does much of anything 

Re: Rob Bell on Hell
He's a master of ambiguity. Something about the guy sets off my warning radar, but I can't say exactly what it is. Maybe it's just me.mattrose wrote:I don't think he un-ambiguously does much of anything