Did Jesus believe in Total Depravity?

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Sat May 12, 2007 2:15 pm

tartanarmy wrote: But, "all" are raised up on the last day in these texts.
Are all men raised up on the last day? Joh 6:39,
All who look on the Son and believe are:

Joh 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Joh 20:31 But these have been written in order that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through your faith in him you may have life.

tartanarmy wrote: Joh 6:37 All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will in no way cast out.

Joh 6:44 No one can come to Me unless the Father who has sent Me draw him, and I will raise him up at the last day.

Joh 6:65 And He said, Because of this I said to you that no one can come to Me unless it was given to him from My Father.
If your interpretation is correct, then why was Judas lost? Was he drawn as well?

Joh 17:12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.

Judas was lost. So why is it that Judas was drawn to Christ? Why did he not leave long ago as others who heard Christ speak did?

Joh 6:67 So he asked the twelve disciples, "And you---would you also like to leave?"
Joh 6:68 Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words that give eternal life.
Joh 6:69 And now we believe and know that you are the Holy One who has come from God."
Joh 6:70 Jesus replied, "I chose the twelve of you, didn't I? Yet one of you is a devil!"
Joh 6:71 He was talking about Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. For Judas, even though he was one of the twelve disciples, was going to betray him.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

_tartanarmy
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Australia

Post by _tartanarmy » Sun May 13, 2007 7:33 am

Judas is the son of perdition, prophesied to betray the Lord. As plainly taught in the very text you quote. He was not a true follower. He was not of Christ, and being drawn into the company of the disciples is neither here nor there, for he is the ONE EXCEPTION in order for scripture to be fulfilled.

Surely you will not try and use Judas as a way of not accepting the plain reading of John 6 and how God saves His people? see John 17 and John 10:28.

All who look on the Son and believe are:

Joh 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Joh 20:31 But these have been written in order that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through your faith in him you may have life.
Yes, but those who look are the same group from v37 who are FIRST GIVEN to the Son by the Father.
The same group who are raised up on the last day.

1/ They are given by the Father to the Son
2/ They shall come to the Son
3/ None of them shall be lost (except Judas as foretold)
4/ They are all raised up on the last day.

or
Joh 6:37 (a) All that the Father gives Me
Joh 6:37 (b) shall come to Me,
Joh 6:37 (c) and the one who comes to Me
Joh 6:37 (d) I will in no way cast out.

What comes first? Us coming to Christ or us being given to Christ?

Calvinism teaches that we believe in consequence to being given to the Son. We are consistent with scripture. One of the reasons we believe that regeneration precedes faith.

Now follow these passages all the way through.
The same ones given are the same ones who shall come, the same ones who shall not be lost, and the same ones all raised on the last day.

See also, John 3 already discussed here! and consider

Joh 1:13 who were born, not of bloods, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but were born of God.

Jesus Prays for these ones in John 17

Joh 17:2 even as You have given Him authority over all flesh so that He should give eternal life to all You have given Him.

These facts harmonise perfectly with all the so called other passages (Arminian proof texts) we are accused of reading our theology into.
Our theology comes from scripture alone.

What is the big idea/picture in John 6 all about? From verse 1 right through to verse 71?

Mark
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Sun May 13, 2007 2:36 pm

tartanarmy wrote:Judas is the son of perdition, prophesied to betray the Lord. As plainly taught in the very text you quote. He was not a true follower. He was not of Christ, and being drawn into the company of the disciples is neither here nor there, for he is the ONE EXCEPTION in order for scripture to be fulfilled.
Yes Judas was prophesied to betray the Lord. You still haven't explained how Judas remained a follower even after others left him. We know how he become one of the twelve, he was chosen by Christ. You said he was not a "true" follower. But I still don't understand your position. If no one comes unless the Father draws him (Which I believe is all men since the time Jesus was crucified as per John 12:32) then how is it that Judas was able to remain so long. Are you admitting that some people can come to follow Christ on their own ability? If not then how was Judas able?

You mentioned that this may be a exception because it was prophesied. Yet Paul makes this prediction:

1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith...

If you have to be regenerated before you can have faith (according to Calvinist), and there will be those who depart from faith then it seems there will be those who are regenerated and then fall away. Would not this, as in the case of Judas also fulfill prophecy?
tartanarmy wrote: Surely you will not try and use Judas as a way of not accepting the plain reading of John 6 and how God saves His people? see John 17 and John 10:28.
Again, Romans 4 says were are justified by the exercising of faith, not before. Is Paul in contradiction to John? I think not, since John himself penned:

Joh 20:31 But these have been written in order that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through your faith in him you may have life.

The belief comes first, then life (regeneration). John and Paul agree. Are we drawn by God? absolutely! Does God act first? Yes! Is an exercising of faith required on our part first? Apparently so.
tartanarmy wrote: Yes, but those who look are the same group from v37 who are FIRST GIVEN to the Son by the Father.
The same group who are raised up on the last day.

What comes first? Us coming to Christ or us being given to Christ?
My original point was that there was a unique time in history when the Messiah came. Those who were living at that time were either faithful or unfaithful to God. The faithful were Gods' and were given by God to Jesus since Jesus was now ushering in a new era as Lord. Since that time I don't see how God is still giving people to Christ in the way it was done at that time. Once Jesus began His preaching, He was calling the unfaithful to repent because the Kingdom of God was at hand. To become a disciple, you must come to Christ. Was Jesus not talking about those who already belong to God at that time?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

User avatar
_SoaringEagle
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:40 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Post by _SoaringEagle » Sun May 13, 2007 4:07 pm

Ah yes, John chapter 6. The chapter that exposes Non Calvinist presuppositions and completely shatters Arminianism.
Does it? What do you think of this here on John 6 and this on John 1:12-13?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_tartanarmy
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Australia

Post by _tartanarmy » Wed May 16, 2007 4:21 am

tartanarmy wrote:
Judas is the son of perdition, prophesied to betray the Lord. As plainly taught in the very text you quote. He was not a true follower. He was not of Christ, and being drawn into the company of the disciples is neither here nor there, for he is the ONE EXCEPTION in order for scripture to be fulfilled.


Yes Judas was prophesied to betray the Lord. You still haven't explained how Judas remained a follower even after others left him. We know how he become one of the twelve, he was chosen by Christ. You said he was not a "true" follower. But I still don't understand your position. If no one comes unless the Father draws him (Which I believe is all men since the time Jesus was crucified as per John 12:32) then how is it that Judas was able to remain so long. Are you admitting that some people can come to follow Christ on their own ability? If not then how was Judas able?
Of course people come on their own ability! But, not all remain do they?
You said, (Which I believe is all men since the time Jesus was crucified as per John 12:32)

How can it be all men, when the text teaches the opposite?

The text teaches “All that the Father gives to me”, how on earth can that be twisted to say all men?

All that are given are raised up on the last day!
Are all men raised up on the last day?
You mentioned that this may be a exception because it was prophesied. Yet Paul makes this prediction:

1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith...
Yes, and they shall.

That is why we are told the parable of the soils (Mark 4), and that is why John say’s,

1Jo 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they were of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out so that it might be revealed that they were not all of us.
If you have to be regenerated before you can have faith (according to Calvinist), and there will be those who depart from faith then it seems there will be those who are regenerated and then fall away. Would not this, as in the case of Judas also fulfill prophecy?
No one who is regenerated shall fall away. That is what Calvinism teaches, as does scripture.
Judas was not regenerated. Where does scripture say he was?
tartanarmy wrote:

Surely you will not try and use Judas as a way of not accepting the plain reading of John 6 and how God saves His people? see John 17 and John 10:28.


Again, Romans 4 says were are justified by the exercising of faith, not before. Is Paul in contradiction to John? I think not, since John himself penned:
I am not talking about Justification! I am talking about regeneration....They are not the same thing.
Joh 20:31 But these have been written in order that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through your faith in him you may have life.

The belief comes first, then life (regeneration). John and Paul agree. Are we drawn by God? absolutely! Does God act first? Yes! Is an exercising of faith required on our part first? Apparently so.
Faith comes after regeneration.
Justification comes after faith.
Calvinism teaches we are Justified by Faith. That is a reformed teaching!

We are saved by Grace, through faith!
tartanarmy wrote:

Yes, but those who look are the same group from v37 who are FIRST GIVEN to the Son by the Father.
The same group who are raised up on the last day.

What comes first? Us coming to Christ or us being given to Christ?


My original point was that there was a unique time in history when the Messiah came. Those who were living at that time were either faithful or unfaithful to God. The faithful were Gods' and were given by God to Jesus since Jesus was now ushering in a new era as Lord.


No offence, but it was a simple question. None of that addresses John 6:37.
Since that time I don't see how God is still giving people to Christ in the way it was done at that time.


Done at that time? Is there more than one way of salvation?
I am struggling to meaningfully interact with you here, in light of the scriptures I have given, and your willingness to overturn its plain meaning.
Once Jesus began His preaching, He was calling the unfaithful to repent because the Kingdom of God was at hand. To become a disciple, you must come to Christ. Was Jesus not talking about those who already belong to God at that time?
Please, read John 6 as if you have never ever studied it (maybe you haven’t). In fact do a study of the whole chapter and get a feel for what is happening there.

Here are a few passages to consider from John 6, but it would be really great if you do a fresh read of the chapter.

John 6

Joh 6:1 After these things Jesus went over the Sea of Galilee, the Sea of Tiberias.
Joh 6:2 And a great multitude followed Him, because they saw His miracles which He did on the sick ones.

Joh 6:6 And He said this to test him, for He Himself knew what He would do.

Joh 6:12 And when they were filled, He said to His disciples, Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing is lost.

Joh 6:14 Then seeing the miracle that Jesus did, those men said, This is truly the Prophet, the One coming into the world.

Joh 6:24 therefore, when the crowd saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they themselves also entered into the boats and came to Capernaum seeking Jesus.

Joh 6:26 Jesus answered them and said, Truly, truly, I say to you, You seek Me not because you saw the miracles, but because you ate the loaves and were filled.

Joh 6:28 Then they said to Him, What shall we do that we might work the works of God?

Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said to them, This is the work of God, that you believe on Him whom He has sent.

Joh 6:34 Then they said to him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.


Joh 6:36 But I said to you that you also have seen Me and do not believe.
Joh 6:37 All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will in no way cast out.


Joh 6:39 And this is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all which He has given Me I should lose nothing but should raise it up again at the last day.

Joh 6:43 Jesus therefore answered and said to them, Do not murmur with one another.

Joh 6:44 No one can come to Me unless the Father who has sent Me draw him, and I will raise him up at the last day.

Joh 6:56 He who partakes of My flesh and drinks My blood dwells in Me, and I in him.

Joh 6:60 Then when they had heard, many of His disciples said, This is a hard saying, who can hear it?

Joh 6:63 It is the Spirit that makes alive, the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit and are life.

Joh 6:64 But there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who is the one betraying Him.

Joh 6:65 And He said, Because of this I said to you that no one can come to Me unless it was given to him from My Father.

Joh 6:66 From this time many of His disciples went back into the things behind, and walked no more with Him.

Joh 6:67 Then Jesus said to the Twelve, Do you also wish to go away?

Joh 6:68 Then Simon Peter answered Him, Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the Words of eternal life.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_tartanarmy
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Australia

Post by _tartanarmy » Wed May 16, 2007 5:29 am

Quote:
Ah yes, John chapter 6. The chapter that exposes Non Calvinist presuppositions and completely shatters Arminianism.


Does it? What do you think of this here on John 6 and this on John 1:12-13 ?
As far as the response to John 6, I will read it when I have a moment. I would prefer you to provide your own responses to John 6.

John 1:12-13 ? The writer of the link you posted states,
The sentence, "born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man," does not refer to salvation but to physical birth. "Born of blood" refers to the ordinary means through which humans are brought into the world — physical birth. The "will of the flesh" refers to sexual desire. The "the will of man" refers to physical sexual intercourse that produces procreation. That is, two people decide to get married, and have children.

It was not God's sovereignty in unconditional election that John was addressing in this passage at all, nor the lack of man's free choice. It was purely a contrast between the "natural" ("born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man") and the "supernatural" ("but of God").
This is perhaps the worst reading of these passages I have ever read!
What do you think of these comments?

He said,
This passage is so "Arminian" I am amazed when Calvinists appeal to it!
I am still recovering from that comment!

Think about what is being assumed.

1/ Free will.
Where does scripture teach “not man having a will as Scripture and Calvinism teachesBUT “Free will”???
That is THE error of Arminianism.

2/ The text says “ Not of the will of man”! What is the Not?

Well it AIN’T physical birth being addressed here, but regeneration.

The language is figurative, that is, speaking as to how one becomes born again.
The word is ghen-nah'-o, which when used figuratively means regeneration!
See any standard Greek concordance/lexicon for affirmation.

The passage addresses how one becomes a child of God.

The passages are saying that we become children of God, not by being born physically by blood, nor by the volition (desires and free choice) of man, but as Jesus goes on to teach more fully in chapter 3, by being born again by the Holy Spirit of God.

I have to wonder why some Arminians try to overturn these vital passages about salvation on their head in order to allow some kind of freedom to man that scripture nowhere teaches! Why I ask?

The author tries to make the context not about salvation, but about physical procreation!
That is exactly what Nicodemus assumed in John Chapter 3!

I do not know what else to say at this point...

I have to add this quote
nor the will of the flesh [sexual desire]
Man, please!

Mark
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_SoaringEagle
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:40 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Post by _SoaringEagle » Wed May 16, 2007 10:48 am

Mark,

The problem with your response is that you fail to touch on 1) the context mentioned in the artcle, 2) the textual variant, and 3) the conclusion. Once you deal with these, then you win the right to say:

* This is perhaps the worst reading of these passages I have ever read!
* I am still recovering from that comment!
* I have to wonder why some Arminians try to overturn these vital passages about salvation on their head in order to allow some kind of freedom to man that scripture nowhere teaches!
The author tries to make the context not about salvation, but about physical procreation! That is exactly what Nicodemus assumed in John Chapter 3!
Actually, the auther shows why the context is about a physical birth, and not spiritual regeneration. The context is dealing with the birth of Christ and the Word being "made flesh". It's all Christ-Centered. The Nicodemus discussion is irrelevent to this, because there Jesus is talking about the spiritual birth. John 1 here is talking about Christ's physical birth.
I do not know what else to say at this point...
Read the whole thing carefully and you might recant on your bent thoughts on this passage. 8)
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “Calvinism, Arminianism & Open Theism”