Emmet, that's it. But it should be noted that the wiki article was written by someone who knows nothing about the project, other than what they read in the Times and the Wall Street Journal. I was Brent's biggest critic when he brought the idea to me. It was watching the raw, unedited interviews with the mainstream scientists early on in production that threw me for a loop. I couldn't believe what these guys (who are now protesting the movie) said on film. The backlash has much to do with a British scientist named John Moore and a few others who didn't come off looking so great. They said Brent took them out of context but he has offered to show the unedited footage to them and debate them in public. They have, thus far, declined his offer citing that he isn't worthy to be debated.

The film has won best picture at a number of film festivals so the general public seems OK with the content.