Seth wrote:I've read some of the early church writings, but none that pertain to the process of Revelation being included in the Canon. Anybody have any references to this ever coming up?
Revelation wasn't universally accepted as "part of the Canon" by the main church until after 380 A.D.
It is difficult to say when the church actually defined the canon as we have it today in Protestant Bibles. Even the influential Athanasius (367 A.D.) who came close to doing so, calling his list "wells of salvation" and applying the plagues of adding to the book of Revelation
to his list. However, even Athanasius included Baruch in his list and excluded Esther.
The following listed Revelation among the disputed books:
Eusebius of Caesaria 324 A.D.
Amphilocius of Iconium 380 A.D
And these omitted it from their lists, implying its rejection:
Cyril of Jerusalem 348 A.D.
Gregory of Naziantus 380 A.D.
Apostolic Canons 380 A.D.
Pershitta Version 400 A.D.
Report of Junilius 550 A.D.
The last three, however, come from the Syriac church which did not regard some of the disputed books as part of the canon until the ninth century.
If you would like to search further about such matters, here is the best site I have ever encounted:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/index.html