Hello Theophilus
You wrote:What is the Tree of Life?
Wikipedia also has an article here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_Li ... Christian)
The LORD is the source of life, so the interpretation of the "tree of life" should probably be closely associated with Him. This quote from Calvin, taken from the Wikipedia article above, is thought provoking,
John Calvin (Commentary on Genesis 2:8), following a different thread in Augustine (City of God, xiii.20), understood the tree in sacramental language. Given that humanity cannot exist except within a covenantal relationship with God, and all covenants use symbols to give us "the attestation of his grace", he gives the tree, "not because it could confer on man that life with which he had been previously endued, but in order that it might be a symbol and memorial of the life which he had received from God."
...
Thus he intends man, as often as he eats the fruit, to remember the source of his life, and acknowledge that he lives not by his own power, but by God’s kindness.
I don't think Calvin had it right.
Genesis 2 (ESV)
15The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it. 16And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, 17but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."
Genesis 3
1Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made.
He said to the woman, "Did God actually say, 'You shall not eat of any tree in the garden'?" 2And the woman said to the serpent, "We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, 3but God said, 'You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.'" 4 But the serpent said to the woman, "You will not surely die. 5For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." 6So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. 7Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.
and you wrote
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."
I've always wondered what Ge 2:17 means {???}
"...but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."
The devil {serpent} "played with the truth" with Eve. But first, we have no record of Adam telling Eve what God had told him, Ge 2:16. He had apparently said "something" to her {???}. The serpent asked Eve about not being permitted to eat from
any tree, Ge 3:1, seemingly to add confusion. Eve's reply was that they weren't allowed to eat, nor to
touch the tree of the knowledge of good & evil, Ge 3:2. As the rest unfolds in Ge 3:4-7, Adam and Eve became wise like God {Heb.,
elohim, can read "like gods"} at least in terms of knowing good and evil.
But what was this knowledge? "Knowing right from wrong" certainly seems to figure in. Could Adam and Eve differentiate between the two before they ate the forbidden fruit? Adam had certainly gotten direct commands from God. He appears to have understood them. We have no reasons to think he didn't. But did he?
Adam is not on record as replying to God that he would obey Him.
As soon as the serpent enters the scene, it's like "What's going on here?" Where was Adam when Eve talked to the serpent? Had he, or she, wandered off from the other? We don't know. But they weren't together at the time.
In any event, I've wondered if Adam & Eve didn't eat from the Tree of Life because, well, they were already alive weren't they? Everything was going along in their lives {new though they be}....
Genesis 3 (ESV)
22Then the LORD God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—" 23therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. 24He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.
Did Adam & Eve, with their new "wisdom," learn that the Tree of Life would give them
neverending life? It's likely, Ge 3:22. Earlier it was the Tree they apparently thought they didn't need to eat from.
After speaking to them {in Ge 3 which I haven't posted}, God wasted no time in kicking them out of the Garden and put a "quick seal" on the Tree of Life lest Adam
"reach out his hand" and eat some on the way out!!! God, obviously, didn't want that to happen.
At any rate, had God not taken action in banning them from the Garden, they could have eaten from the Tree of Life and lived forever. God knew the Tree of Life gave this, and now, they did.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back to Calvin.
I haven't read what else he wrote about this. But his treatment from what you posted, Theophilus, seems more like a "devotional" than exegesis.
Calvin wrote:Given that humanity cannot exist except within a covenantal relationship with God....
Adam and Eve existed in relationship with God, though they disobeyed Him. Had they covenanted with God, as I wrote before:
Genesis doesn't mention any type of "agreement" {covenant} Adam and Eve made with Him! Neither Adam nor Eve made any promises to obey!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As an aside, there were Jewish traditions that said fallen angels taught humanity various crafts and skills; crafts and skills that God had intended to teach...in His Own time. The trickery of the serpent in Genesis sort of ties into this idea, in that the serpent seemed to want to "rush" things by getting Eve confused.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earlier I wrote:I've always wondered what Ge 2:17 means {???} "...but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."
Most of us have heard this death was "spiritual death" and that "physical death was delayed." True,
"in Adam all die," wrote Paul. We know we die physically, at least, as a result of "the fall of Adam" or since sin entered into the world.
Some have interpreted the phrase,
"...in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die" to be God's way of saying,
"You will become mortal." I lean toward this interpretation and can't quite "unravel" {for lack of vocabulary} if Adam and Eve "died spiritually" when they ate from the Knowledge Tree.
Had they eaten from the Tree of Life first, this could be a natural conclusion. Yet had they eaten from this they would have lived forever...
unless....
But, of course, things didn't happen that way....
Just some thoughts for now.
I'd like to get to Revelation on this topic later, Thanks,
