Michelle, Hiya,
Re: Beliefnet you wrote:I truly don't know how I started getting their emails, but I probably clicked on something or other. I would have appreciated their emails more if they were more substantial and gave me something to think about during the day. They were very light-weight, general feel-good messages. I haven't explored around the Beliefnet website, yet. Maybe I will soon.
Oic...Well, all I can say is you'll have to really surf to find the good threads. They're there tho. And you may have folks from virtually any worldview posting....(be prepared), lol
Re: In-Person Yacking you wrote:Actually I don't like talking on the phone very much, either. I DO like to talk, however. Maybe I'm just better when I can read the body language and facial expressions of the person I'm conversing with. I'm not really sure.
I LOVE to sit and talk theology with one neighbor I have. He's a self-taught theologian (no Bible college but you'd think he has a degree)! But between his 2 kids running back & forth (and his wife doing her best to keep them under control, bless her heart), the baby teething, cell phones going off, the tv blaring and so on...we don't get very far. So, I just come back to my lonely bachelor pad and
get online for some serious theology!
I wrote:"Knowing a lot of theology is a difficult thing to be humble about"...[and you replied]...."and yet so many are able to manage it"...
To me the hardest part is finding what the actual issues are.
Then we have something to go by. People can manage to look at, discuss, and/or debate "you name it." I don't know...the word "relevance" pops to mind.
[quote="Re: fellowshipping with "heretics" you"]So do you mean that you find it possible to fellowship with people
you consider heretics? Or do you mean that you need to keep looking for others with the same heretical ideas you have? That's what I meant...that there always seems to be more than one person who holds to any particular heresy. By the way, I watched the PBS program last night about translating the Bible into English. The program was interesting. Those men were considered heretics in their time, and there were a lot of them.[/quote]
Yes, good PBS program!
I couldn't, in a clear conscience, contribute financially to a church that teaches dispensationalism. Nor would I feel all that comfortable about inviting any (believing or non-believing) friends to it.
The only people I know who "have" my same (or similar) "heretical views" are far away in seminaries! Larry Hurtado, Margaret Barker, and Alan Segal (who is Jewish) are some of them. Hurtado isn't considered heretical (in terms of "orthodoxy") that I know of. However, some of the more fundamentalistic evangelicals see him as at least "liberal" in areas relating to inerrancy; which, to them, might qualify him as a heretic in their view. Hurtado is quite
strong in his refutations of the Jesus Seminar (prolly the best ever!) and spoke at ETS (Evangelical Theological Society) last Novemebr. Margaret Barker is probably a few more notches to the theological-left than I as she fully accepts "The JEDP Theory" (of OT redaction or editing). I'm undecided on that. Her view of Ancient Judaism being polytheistic: I basically accept (but please don't tell anyone)! Alan Segal, while not being a Christian, is a leading NT Era and Early Christianity expert. He was on one or two of Peter Jennings' last "Christianity" specials on ABC.
Have a Nice Day, Michelle.