Age of Reason...Age of Discernment?

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:23 am

psalm 22
9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother's breast.

I doubt that the author of this remembered being brought out of the womb , it is more a statement meaning that he cannot remember a time before which he did not believe.
There is no "in you" in either the Masoretic text or the Septuagint.

In the lexicons, an alternative to the Hebrew translated as "trust" is "feel secure".

David was saying to God, "You made me feel secure at my mother's breast." Most babies feel that way.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

User avatar
_Thomas
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Panama

Post by _Thomas » Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:45 am

Paidon:

Or can be translated as:

9 For thou [art] He bringing me forth from the womb, Causing me to trust, On the breasts of my mother. (or "while on My mother’s breasts." KJV)

10 On Thee I have been cast from the womb, From the belly of my mother Thou [art] my God.

In Spanish it is confiado , translated as to have confidence in.

The thrust of the verse is to trust or "feel secure" in God , not in the mother's breast.

Thomas
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_1238
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Age of Reason

Post by __id_1238 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:07 am

Dear Forum Readers,

I agree that in Catholic Christian, Lutheran Christian Churches and other churches that this application of an “age” is tied in with the age of catechism , confirmation and receiving the Eucharist. It is also obvious that it is necessary for a person to be able to have this “reason”, ie, knowledge, in order to do the above. I would also agree that the significance of this age of reason/discernment/accountability is not closely tied in to salvation because of what was said… “Salvation is seen an act of God's Grace and not an act of a person's reasoning , it is given not accepted.” BINGO. RIGHT ON THE NOSE. THAT ONE IS OUT OF THE BALLPARK!

God can give this gift of Grace to anyone at any time, as God sees fit! Grace is the gift that God uses to effect salvation on all believers. (New Compact Bible Dictionary [NCBD], Zondervan) Therefore, what is salvation? Salvation is the delivery of any kind of evil. It is brought by Jesus as the deliverance from sin (NCBD).

So, if God’s Grace is an act of God and not by reason, then this would explain why the paralyzed sinner in Luke 5 received salvation without any effort on his part. God saw his friend’s faith and imparted salvation (sin removal) upon the paralyzed man. Jesus healed him both physically and spiritually. This is a beautiful story of love …. friends bring another who is afflicted with a problem to God and God heals that person either physically, spiritually or both.

The Bible is replete with stories of such healings where the faithful parent or friend brings the afflicted to Jesus for a healing and Jesus does exactly that. Therefore, an age of reason/discernment/accountability is surely partially credible when applied to those believers that can have a level of knowledge and when there is a lack of this knowledge either partially or fully God will fill it in with His love, ie, Grace.

There was no water baptism in Luke 5 or the other healings. There was no verbal “I am a sinner” declaration by the person being healed in those same scriptural stories. It was the FAITH of another loving believer that God saw and imparted His Grace upon them as a complete gift, given unselfishly, with nothing requested back.

Therefore, the infant baptism that some Christian faiths impart on children by their parents is an act of love and faith. It is almost like Luke 5, but in an infant baptism usually there is no physical affliction yet loving believers, in faith, bring a person who can not speak for themselves for this gift of Grace, this gift of salvation, a deliverance from sin. Water is that earthly medium that Christians relate to from scripture where we see Jesus was baptized in water and the Holy Spirit came upon Him. We also see that previously baptized disciples re-received the Holy Spirit again at Pentecost (Acts 2) without any water baptism …. again, a free gift from God that was not requested, simply given without these disciple’s request.

Why do we Christians go through these earthly motions of water baptism? Is it to show other Christians at church our faith, our acceptance? Some do, but this would be against scripture as in Galatians 1:10 “Am I now seeking human approval, or God's approval? Or am I trying to please people? If I were still pleasing people, I would not be a servant of Christ.” Or, Matt 6:1-5

“(But) take care not to perform righteous deeds in order that people may see them; otherwise, you will have no recompense from your heavenly Father ….. "When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, who love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on street corners so that others may see them. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward.”

Baptism is an act of the believer bringing those that can not speak for themselves to God and “also” those that can speak for themselves. Just as Peter states in Acts 2:38 "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the holy Spirit.” A baptized individual receives salvation with baptism … BE baptized … FOR forgiveness of your sins. Naturally, Peter is speaking to those that can/should have knowledge to accept the gift of Grace but it does state unequivocally that baptism is for the forgiveness of sins.

The fact that baptism saves is emphasized again in scripture. Just as the water in the story of Noah’s saved those who believed, Peter states that “ …. in the days of Noah during the building of the ark, in which a few persons, eight in all, were saved through water. This prefigured baptism, which saves you now. It is not a removal of dirt from the body but an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1Pet 3:18)

We also know that baptism is offered to ALL and to those that “God calls”, again, the previous post statement that Grace, salvation, deliverance from sin is an act of God (whomever God will call) not of reason is perfect in scripture …. “For the promise is made to you and to your children and to all those far off, whomever the Lord our God will call.” (Acts 2:39)

That is interesting because if you look at the Holy Spirit (3rd person of the Trinity) it can not occupy a body with sin, so sin has to be gone, removed before the Holy Spirit will enter and abide within that person. In the OT, we can see that the Ark of the Covenant was so pure that no man could touch it because sin could not occupy it. The Ark was a pre-figuration of Jesus because no sin could occupy Jesus either. As the Ark contained the Ten Commandments, Manna from heaven and Aaron’s rod, Jesus is the fulfillment of the Commandments, food from heaven and the priesthood. The Holy Spirit could not and can not abide within a container with sin, so when a person receives the gift of the Holy Spirit at Baptism (Acts 2:38) then sin, as promised, is removed …. ie, Grace, Salvation, Deliverance from sin.

Even though Martin Luther appears to have been a very angry man in much of his writings, he still was “on the money” (so to speak) about a number of things that had gone awry in the Catholic Church’s leadership, he was also pretty sane when he said this about Baptism and infants ….

…. "Since our baptizing has been thus from the beginning of Christianity & the custom has been to baptize children, & since no one can prove w/good reasons that they do not have faith, we should not make changes & build on such weak arguments. For if we are going to change or do away w/customs that are traditional, it is necessary to prove convincingly that these are contrary to the Word of God”.

Even Luther was lucid enough to acknowledge that he had no idea if their was an age of reason/discernment/accountability for faith because there was and is no proof with good reason that an infant has faith or not. We can not think or comprehend on God’s level, yet some Christians attempt to by saying there must be a verbal statement of faith. Luther realized that God speaks all languages and even those we can not mutter.

Someone previously asked rhetorically, when talking about “limbo”, saying “[then why baptize at all if you have to be baptized to be saved]?” I would like to refer a number of you to an excellent article that I can not duplicate herein, but you can certainly find it with a little effort. It is an article in THIS ROCK magazine (Oct 2007, page 24) titled LET THE CHILDREN COME TO ME, by Matthew Newsome. It is published by Catholic Answers so you can go to their web site. It answers a lot of those limbo ambiguous questions very well.

Christ’s Peace and for those that know I am praying for some specifics, I placed some petitions before St. Therese today.

“Elisha died and was buried…. while some Israelites were burying a man, suddenly … they threw the man's body into Elisha's tomb. When the body touched Elisha's bones, the man came to life and stood up on his feet. (2nd Kings 13: 20-21)

Also, just as others brought and prayed for physical healing for others that did not ask for it, God healed the sick. God is giddy with joy when we do the same for those sick around us. The prayers continue.

Catholic Steve
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:38 pm

CatholicSteve,

I hardly know where to begin regarding your last post!
I agree that in Catholic Christian, Lutheran Christian Churches and other churches that this application of an “age” is tied in with the age of catechism , confirmation and receiving the Eucharist. It is also obvious that it is necessary for a person to be able to have this “reason”, ie, knowledge, in order to do the above.
I do not find Jesus or the Apostles having anything to say about "cathecisms and confirmations", but why would a person's age matter in regard to them and not baptism, when in the bible belief on the part of the person baptized is always expressed or implied? You can not show one case where this is not so.
Therefore, the infant baptism that some Christian faiths impart on children by their parents is an act of love and faith. It is almost like Luke 5, but in an infant baptism usually there is no physical affliction yet loving believers, in faith, bring a person who can not speak for themselves for this gift of Grace, this gift of salvation, a deliverance from sin.
Baptism is an act of the believer bringing those that can not speak for themselves to God and “also” those that can speak for themselves.
It would appear that we have been all "missing the boat" on this one! If you are correct, we should surreptitiously go about baptizing the little children of every unbeliever! Think of all the Christians we could make! Simply volunteer to baby-sit, start a day-care, etc. and have a small bottle of water in handy in your pocket, believe for the little ones by proxy, sprinkle a few drops of water on 'em, and we could have the greatest revival the world has ever known!
There was no water baptism in Luke 5 or the other healings. There was no verbal “I am a sinner” declaration by the person being healed in those same scriptural stories. It was the FAITH of another loving believer that God saw and imparted His Grace upon them as a complete gift, given unselfishly, with nothing requested back.
And even better news! All those people who do not know God, who never heard of Jesus, we can believe for them too and their sins will be forgiven! No need to baptize them!
Why do we Christians go through these earthly motions of water baptism?
How about because our Lord commanded it? It is a Divine positive law.
This prefigured baptism, which saves you now. It is not a removal of dirt from the body but an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1Pet 3:21)
And you quote this scripture, 1 Peter 3:21, apparently not realizing that it overturns any idea of unbelievers being baptized, unless, of course, you believe that one can also make an appeal to God for a clear conscience by proxy, along with believing for the other person.
That is interesting because if you look at the Holy Spirit (3rd person of the Trinity) it can not occupy a body with sin, so sin has to be gone, removed before the Holy Spirit will enter and abide within that person.
So when, as James says, "We all stumble (sin) in many ways", does the Holy Spirit leave us again and again?
Christ’s Peace and for those that know I am praying for some specifics, I placed some petitions before St. Therese today.
And do you think "Saint" Therese is kinder, more sympathetic, more interested in your requests than our loving Father, He is too busy to be bothered, or what? I do not understand.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:40 pm

CatholicSteve,

I hardly know where to begin regarding your last post!
I agree that in Catholic Christian, Lutheran Christian Churches and other churches that this application of an “age” is tied in with the age of catechism , confirmation and receiving the Eucharist. It is also obvious that it is necessary for a person to be able to have this “reason”, ie, knowledge, in order to do the above.
I do not find Jesus or the Apostles having anything to say about "cathecisms and confirmations", but why would a person's age matter in regard to them and not baptism, when in the bible belief on the part of the person baptized is always expressed or implied? You can not show one case where this is not so.
Therefore, the infant baptism that some Christian faiths impart on children by their parents is an act of love and faith. It is almost like Luke 5, but in an infant baptism usually there is no physical affliction yet loving believers, in faith, bring a person who can not speak for themselves for this gift of Grace, this gift of salvation, a deliverance from sin.
Baptism is an act of the believer bringing those that can not speak for themselves to God and “also” those that can speak for themselves.
It would appear that we have been all "missing the boat" on this one! If you are correct, we should surreptitiously go about baptizing the little children of every unbeliever! Think of all the Christians we could make! Simply volunteer to baby-sit, start a day-care, etc. and have a small bottle of water in handy in your pocket, believe for the little ones by proxy, sprinkle a few drops of water on 'em, and we could have the greatest revival the world has ever known!
There was no water baptism in Luke 5 or the other healings. There was no verbal “I am a sinner” declaration by the person being healed in those same scriptural stories. It was the FAITH of another loving believer that God saw and imparted His Grace upon them as a complete gift, given unselfishly, with nothing requested back.
And even better news! All those people who do not know God, who never heard of Jesus, we can believe for them too and their sins will be forgiven! No need to baptize them!
Why do we Christians go through these earthly motions of water baptism?
How about because our Lord commanded it? It is a Divine positive law.
This prefigured baptism, which saves you now. It is not a removal of dirt from the body but an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1Pet 3:21)
And you quote this scripture, 1 Peter 3:21, apparently not realizing that it overturns any idea of unbelievers being baptized, unless, of course, you believe that one can also make an appeal to God for a clear conscience by proxy, along with believing for the other person.
That is interesting because if you look at the Holy Spirit (3rd person of the Trinity) it can not occupy a body with sin, so sin has to be gone, removed before the Holy Spirit will enter and abide within that person.
So when, as James says, "We all stumble (sin) in many ways", does the Holy Spirit leave us again and again?
Christ’s Peace and for those that know I am praying for some specifics, I placed some petitions before St. Therese today.
And do you think "Saint" Therese is kinder, more sympathetic, more interested in your requests than our loving Father, He is too busy to be bothered, or what? I do not understand.
Also, just as others brought and prayed for physical healing for others that did not ask for it, God healed the sick. God is giddy with joy when we do the same for those sick around us. The prayers continue.
Praise God! We agree about something! :D
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

User avatar
_Thomas
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Panama

Post by _Thomas » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:24 am

Several months ago I was talking to a freind about the "age of accountability". He's Chech and has apparently never talked to a credo-baptist. So when I told him the belief was that unbaptised children were not accountable for their sins and would go to heaven , he said in all seriousness:

"You mean if I really love my children and want them to go to heaven , I should shoot them when they're twelve?"

Thomas
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Thomas
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Panama

Post by _Thomas » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:24 am

Homer:
I do not find Jesus or the Apostles having anything to say about "cathecisms and confirmations",
Confirmation is the name given to a three step process.

(1) a course of instruction preceding the rite; this is catecism , as instructed by:

Matt. 28:20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you;...

(2) profession of faith, usually made through an examination and summarized in formal questions in the rite , as instructed by:

Matt. 10:“Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven.

(3) intercessory prayers by the congregation, normally with imposition of hands. From:

2 Cor:1:21. Now he that confirmeth us with you in Christ and that hath anointed us, is God:
22. Who also hath sealed us and given the pledge of the Spirit in our hearts.

Acts 8:15. Who, when they were come, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost.16. For he was not as yet come upon any of them: but they were only baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17. Then they laid their hands upon them: and they received the Holy Ghost.

Age and reasoning are necessary for steps 1 &2 .Practice varies widely on step 3 as the Orthodox do this as a part of infant baptism , and in the case of adult baptism 1 & 2 are done first while 3 is omitted.

Thomas
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Mort_Coyle
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by _Mort_Coyle » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:25 am

"You mean if I really love my children and want them to go to heaven , I should shoot them when they're twelve?"
This is essentially why Andrea Yates killed her five children.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Yates

Better yet, if most people are going to end up suffering everlasting torment in Hell (as many Christians believe), then the church should be vigorously promoting abortion. Better to be aborted and remain innocent than to be born and face eternal torment.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_1238
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Super hero stuff!

Post by __id_1238 » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:27 pm

Dear Forum Readers,

Some non-labeled Christians only believe in an English written Bible. Do you know how we can see that? Because "Jesus or the Apostles" having anything to say about "catechisms and confirmations" is not written verbatim for some of these people! That is why if they look at a French or Spanish Bible or countless other language Bibles they will also have some words/phrases missing, but for this one non-labeled Christian he has to have it "word for word" in English, no less!! That is why this Christian probably does not believe in the word TRINITY because it is not written or used by Jesus or the Apostles verbatim!

Yet, he appears to be able to state with some veracity that a person's age DOES MATTER because, if it is not expressed, than it is certainly "IMPLIED". Oh, so does that allow other Christians to "imply" a theological argument also? NO, I guess it is only for non-labeled Christians to take such a bold step, only they can "imply"! Some people are at the height of hypocrisy.

The word catechism etymologically means "teaching by the spoken word". To catechize someone was to literally "instruct them orally". The English word came about from ecclesiastical Greek and the Latin "catechizare" (Dictionary of Word Origins). The catechism is sometimes referred to as a book giving a brief summary of the basic principles of Christianity in question-and-answer form. So I guess Jesus or the apostles never taught by the "spoken word". I can also assume that Jesus or the apostles never used any books (Jewish or other) to teach the principles of God. I am sorry that some people go so far as to imply that Jesus or the apostles taught by the spoken-word or taught from a book. How rude of us to be so bold as to "imply" such behavior from scripture. I did not realize that to "imply" was only a virtue only that non-labeled Christians can use.

"Missing the boat"? I think some of these non-labeled Christians have not even picked up the oars yet! Are you reading this everyone? It appears that it would be "bad" to have more Christians than less Christians because someone could actually be baptized, brought into God's circle. That tone of Christian arrogance is exemplified in scripture when disciples were mad that children were being brought to Jesus...."Oh my Gosh, how dare they do that! We don't want more Christians!"

Matthew 19:13-15
"Then little children were brought to Jesus for him to place his hands on them and pray for them. But the [non-labeled Christians] rebuked those who brought them. Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them [you non-labeled Christians], for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." When he had placed his hands on them, he went on from there."

As you can see liberties were taken to paraphrase that passage as to how I feel some on this site feel about children coming into the community of God as Christians. Do you see/read the venom in his tone "...believe for the little ones by proxy..." and [boom, they are Christians]. Some non-labeled Christians believe that the healings both physically and spiritually were only flukes and can never happen again in the NT Church times that we live in. It's true, a non-labeled Christian told me so!!! We can all go to scripture and read...

Mk 5:22-23, 35-43 Jairus asked Jesus to raise his dead daughter and does so simply by "believing" in proxy Jesus raises his dead daughter.

Mk 9:17-27 Jesus was asked to expel (exorcized) a demon from his son and does so simply by believing in proxy and Jesus expels the evil.

Lk 7:2 The slave was cured by Jesus due to Centurion's faith in proxy, not the boy and it was not even his family but Jesus cured the boy.

Mk 2:1-5 The paralyzed man was cured and also had his sins forgiven by other people's faith in proxy, not paralyzed man and Jesus again did it all.

But, you know what? None of that applies to us Christians in these NT times. It happened only once and will never happen again and we are NEVER to use scripture as an example of what can happen in our NT times. Shame on you if you dared to think otherwise!

"Divine positive law" .... is that in the Bible or implied? Are those words really used or are they simply a non-labeled Christian tradition? "Look out and step back, I'm the Non-Labeled Christian Super Hero, I'm going to use DPL (Divine positive law) against those Catholics!" POW! BANG! SLAM! (Down goes that Catholic)

"So when, as James says, "We all stumble (sin) in many ways", does the Holy Spirit leave us again and again?".... just look into the mirror and I think you have your answer ... POW! BANG! SLAM! ... you gotta watch our for that DPL super hero stuff!

"And do you think "Saint" Therese is kinder, more sympathetic, more interested in your requests than our loving Father, He is too busy to be bothered, or what? I do not understand." .... wow, you finally got something right!!! You don't understand and you know what? I truly don't think you ever will. You are so full of hate and venom that you can not see the saints in heaven holding our prayers before they reach God (sorry again, I apologize I used scripture and implied something again...oops!)

As for Confirmation I will defer to Thomas' explanation in his post where he goes on from "Confirmation is the name given to a three step process .... " It is very well said. At least I thought so. You probably thought otherwise.

Some of you non-labeled Christians selectively read scripture, but that is good for you. That is the level some of you are on and everyone on this site who reads those comments can get a real taste of your "love"


Peace out, baby! Catholic Steve
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Mort_Coyle
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by _Mort_Coyle » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:33 pm

CatholicSteve,

You would probably be taken more seriously if you could tone down the invective.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”