Sabbath Observance: 3 Views

Right & Wrong
User avatar
_Thomas
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Panama

Post by _Thomas » Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:39 am

Hola Rick:

Now I am confused.
6. The Noahide Laws of Acts 15 omit many of the 614 laws in Mosaic Law (the law of Moses) that Jews were required to obey. But since God-fearers already did obey many, if not most of them, there was no need to tell them to "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy."
If you are saying that Acts 15 was imposing only the Noahide Laws , I agree , as those are binding on all God -Fearing non-Jews. But while the Noahide Laws allow for Sabbath obsevance they do not require it , and as such we would not be required either.

The 7 Noahide Laws prohibit idolitry , murder , theft , sexual imorality , blasphemy and cruelty to animals but require only setting up Just laws to enforce the 6 prohibitions. There are no Sabbath requirements at all.

It would make sense though that Paul was fighting for a seperate Noahide Christian Church of Gentiles to exist alongside a Jewish-Christian Church. Much like the Messianic Jews of today.

Thomas
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Dios te bendiga y te guarde

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:47 am

Hello Thomas, :wink:

I just edited Number 6 (while you were posting) because:
God-fearers did not have to "keep the Sabbath day holy". That was required for full-converts. In other words, their even going to the synagogues in the first place was voluntary. Their worshiping the God of the Bible at all was voluntary!

Sorry about that, I didn't catch it in time!

Btw, I've called the three decisions of Acts 15 Noahide Laws. I might be technically wrong about that (?). But to me they are a "Christian version" of them and were roughly contemporary to the pre-Mishnah stuff (which were later committed to writing, about 200ADff.).
You wrote:A. The 7 Noahide Laws prohibit idolitry , murder , theft , sexual imorality , blasphemy and cruelty to animals but require only setting up Just laws to enforce the 6 prohibitions. There are no Sabbath requirements at all.

B. It would make sense though that Paul was fighting for a seperate Noahide Christian Church of Gentiles to exist alongside a Jewish-Christian Church. Much like the Messianic Jews of today.
A. Again, the God-fearers wanted to go to synagogue...so why tell them they have to go? (No Need: enuf on this point, I suppose).

B. I think the letter to the Romans tries to resolve all of these kinds of issues (or to at lest get the ball rolling in that direction, definitively). I don't see him ever trying to separate (believing) Jews and Gentiles...and am not really sure what you mean.

But the Jerusalem church seemed to think "the whole world will become Jewish" to some degree or in levels: (1) full-Jews, to the Pharisaical party, and (2) James' decisions, which offered salvation to all...with that "God-fearing" requirement (and the laws to go with it).

As far as we know, Jesus never taught anyone, before His Ascension, about how the Kingdom of God would actually unfold. He did say it would start in Jerusalem (but did not call it the "Kingdom of Israel" as the disciples were expecting). It wasn't till Peter's encounter with Cornelius, and Paul's commission to the Gentiles, that the Kingdom was becoming recognizably less "(national) Israel". When the Temple was destroyed, that was the end of a national-kingdom.

James was killed in 62AD and didn't live to know about this. I've always felt that he inherited his Brother's "mantle" in that he, too, was in service to the "lost house of Israel" ("David's fallen tent", Acts 15:16). I also think that, at one time, something close to a majority and/or a high percentage of people in Jerusalem were believers (based in part, on Acts 21)!

Btw, Paul is the first person in Acts to actually proclaim "the Kingdom of God"---and that---in its truly global sense. This sort of freaked me out when I first saw it! But it makes so much sense (see Romans 9-11)...Anyways, I'm rambling!
Rick
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:41 am

Rick_C wrote: 1. Most of the Gentile converts Paul and Barnabas "got" on their first missional journey were not regular Gentiles; they were God-fearers. I'm not saying every single one of them were but, from Acts, it appears they were a majority; they at least "felt free" to go to a synagogue {Acts 13:46-48}.
Not sure what this has to do with anything. The question is, where did they meet after becoming Christians? Did they still meet in the synagogues where the other Jews were still unbelievers? Unless you think they all were converted, what do you think happened after Paul would speak in a synagogue?

Act 13:42 So when the Jews went out of the synagogue, the Gentiles begged that these words might be preached to them the next Sabbath.
Act 13:43 Now when the congregation had broken up, many of the Jews and devout proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.
Act 13:44 On the next Sabbath almost the whole city came together to hear the word of God.
Act 13:45 But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy; and contradicting and blaspheming, they opposed the things spoken by Paul.
Act 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas grew bold and said, "It was necessary that the word of God should be spoken to you first; but since you reject it, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, behold, we turn to the Gentiles.
...
Act 13:50 But the Jews stirred up the devout and prominent women and the chief men of the city, raised up persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them from their region.


I don't think they will be welcome in that synagogue again, nor would I suppose the God fearing Gentile converts would be welcome anymore either.

Sure, Paul knew where to go first to find Jews and God fearers all in one place. But once Paul let the cat...er, the Gospel out of the bag, they weren't exactly rolling out the red carpet for Paul and his converts.
Rick_C wrote: 3. God-fearers worshiped in the synagogues regularly...without becoming full Jewish-converts. (Also, the Court of the Gentiles, in the Temple, was "for" these same people).
Until they became Christians, then they met in groups they called churches (Acts 15:41)
Rick_C wrote: 4. Even the believing-Pharisees knew these God-fearers met in the synagogues; many of them on did so on every Sabbath. These Pharisees knew Paul and Barnabas had met them in synagogues.

5. Therefore, their attending the synagogues (on Sabbaths) wasn't at issue. The issue for the believing-Pharisees was: "We want them to become full-Jews" (and probably felt that if they didn't, they should be kicked out of the synagogues also, though it isn't said).
I don't think they continued to worship in synagogues. At least I don't read of it.
Rick_C wrote: They weren't being "let off the hook" as far as Sabbath observance went for God-fearing Gentiles. For one thing, they didn't want to be let go (and would have never thought of stopping going to synagogue)! When Paul and Barnabas went back to the synagogues and read the letter, they rejoiced over it! (Acts 15:30ff).
Do you think we should keep the Sabbath? (Or 10 commandments, if you prefer)

Note the Acts 15:30 doesn't mention a synagogue, just that they gathered. Maybe it was a synagogue, it's odd that it's not mentioned. Not only that but one of the next things mentioned is:

Act 15:36 Then after some days Paul said to Barnabas, "Let us now go back and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they are doing."

So did they go back to the synagogues?

Act 15:40 Paul chose Silas and departed, being commended by the brethren to the grace of God.
Act 15:41 And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.


Now maybe all the Jews converted and their synagogues are now called churches and they are welcoming Paul with open arms. But I really doubt it. The Jews in a given town that didn't receive Paul's message still met in the synagogue, and it now mentions the Christian gatherings were churches. When people in the synagogues believed Paul it says they followed him. Read Acts 17, it gives two examples of Paul speaking where he knew there would be God fearers and Jews at the synagogue, but the Jews who didn't believe always drove Paul away. I doubt they allowed Christians back, seeing how much they loved Paul.

Act 17:4 And some of them were persuaded; and a great multitude of the devout Greeks, and not a few of the leading women, joined Paul and Silas.
Act 17:5 But the Jews who were not persuaded, becoming envious, took some of the evil men from the marketplace, and gathering a mob, set all the city in an uproar and attacked the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.
Act 17:6 But when they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some brethren to the rulers of the city, crying out, "These who have turned the world upside down have come here too.
...
Act 17:10 Then the brethren immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea. When they arrived, they went into the synagogue of the Jews.
Act 17:11 These were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so.
Act 17:12 Therefore many of them believed, and also not a few of the Greeks, prominent women as well as men.
Act 17:13 But when the Jews from Thessalonica learned that the word of God was preached by Paul at Berea, they came there also and stirred up the crowds.
Act 17:14 Then immediately the brethren sent Paul away, to go to the sea; but both Silas and Timothy remained there.
...
Act 17:33 So Paul departed from among them.
Act 17:34 However, some men joined him and believed, among them Dionysius the Areopagite, a woman named Damaris, and others with them.


It seems Paul was not well received, nor do I think the converts continued to meet in the Jewish synagogues.
Rick_C wrote: So, the God-fearing Gentiles "kept the Sabbath" as they had been doing in the synagogues---but without becoming Jews---and their synagogue attendance wasn't a problem. If it were, the Council would have mentioned it, imo.
I didn't realize going to the synagogue on the seventh day was what God considered "keeping the Sabbath".
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:44 am

dmatic wrote:Actually Thomas, to follow your suggestion is not wise in this case because they have taught non-adherence to God's Laws and instead have taught adherence to man's traditions...and, by definition, have become false prophets and we are not to fear them.

We are instructed to do what God instructs, however!

To not teach believers to keep the sabbath day is to become one who will be called least in the kingdom of heaven.

Peace, dmatic
So was the Jerusalem council in error? (Acts 15)

Act 15:10 Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
Act 15:11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they."
...
Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

User avatar
_Thomas
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Panama

Post by _Thomas » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:44 am

Hola Rick:
I don't see him ever trying to separate (believing) Jews and Gentiles...and am not really sure what you mean.
A quick note:

Paul's action in defending the Gentiles against circumcision , in and of itself , set up two seperate standards of behavior. Not to make them adversaries but to , if possible , have them peacefully co-exist. (seperate but equal ?)

Thomas
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Dios te bendiga y te guarde

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:12 pm

Hello Sean
I wrote:1. Most of the Gentile converts Paul and Barnabas "got" on their first missional journey were not regular Gentiles; they were God-fearers. I'm not saying every single one of them were but, from Acts, it appears they were a majority; they at least "felt free" to go to a synagogue {Acts 13:46-48}.

You replied:
Not sure what this has to do with anything.
Many Christians mistakenly think that when Paul preached to Gentiles, it was always outside of the synagogues. This is why I mention it (or what it has to do with anything). His first Gentile converts on record were God-fearers, right out of the synagogue in Pisidian Anticoch.

If you go through Acts, if a city had a synagague, Paul always went there. I haven't counted the percentage of when this was the case, but would think it would be at least 80 percent of the time. And since the synagogues had God-fearers; Paul's Gentile converts came from the synagogues more often than is realized; perhaps as much 80 percent of them (?). Of course, there were times when Paul preached to "regular" Gentiles, such as in Athens.
You wrote:1. The question is, where did they meet after becoming Christians?

2. Did they still meet in the synagogues where the other Jews were still unbelievers?

3. Unless you think they all were converted, what do you think happened after Paul would speak in a synagogue?
1. In the synagogue, unless otherwise noted.
2. The Jewish-Christians were permitted to worhip in "Pharisee" synagogues after the Temple was destroyed till the mid-second century. In the first century, we don't know to what extent they were accepted in synagogues. Acts tells us of a few times when they were kicked out. There probably were some synagogues that had both believers and non-believers then also.
3. They may have continued to study about Jesus and made a decision later. This caused some to have to leave the synagogues (whether believers or not, depending on if the synagogue became messianic).
I wrote:3. God-fearers worshiped in the synagogues regularly...without becoming full Jewish-converts. (Also, the Court of the Gentiles, in the Temple, was "for" these same people).

You replied:
Until they became Christians, then they met in groups they called churches (Acts 15:41)
"Ekklesia" was used in the LXX describing Jews. Jesus used it with, "I will build my church" (though this probably is a translation, unless He spoke Greek, which is uncertain). In Acts, the Greek word for "synagogue" is used to describe pre-Christian or regular Jewish assemblies.

Paul in Corinth, Acts 18 (NIV)
1After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. 2There he met a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had ordered all the Jews to leave Rome. Paul went to see them, 3and because he was a tentmaker as they were, he stayed and worked with them. 4Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks.

5When Silas and Timothy came from Macedonia, Paul devoted himself exclusively to preaching, testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ. 6But when the Jews opposed Paul and became abusive, he shook out his clothes in protest and said to them, "Your blood be on your own heads! I am clear of my responsibility. From now on I will go to the Gentiles."

7Then Paul left the synagogue and went next door to the house of Titius Justus, a worshiper of God. 8Crispus, the synagogue ruler, and his entire household believed in the Lord; and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptized.


Crispus, being chief synagogue ruler in Corinth, was the number one Jewish leader in the city. Back to Acts 18:

9One night the Lord spoke to Paul in a vision: "Do not be afraid; keep on speaking, do not be silent. 10For I am with you, and no one is going to attack and harm you, because I have many people in this city." 11So Paul stayed for a year and a half, teaching them the word of God.

12While Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews made a united attack on Paul and brought him into court. 13"This man," they charged, "is persuading the people to worship God in ways contrary to the law."

14Just as Paul was about to speak, Gallio said to the Jews, "If you Jews were making a complaint about some misdemeanor or serious crime, it would be reasonable for me to listen to you. 15But since it involves questions about words and names and your own law—settle the matter yourselves. I will not be a judge of such things." 16So he had them ejected from the court. 17Then they all turned on Sosthenes the synagogue ruler and beat him in front of the court. But Gallio showed no concern whatever.

Wikipedia wrote:Sosthenes, meaning "safe in strength," was the chief ruler of the synagogue at Corinth, who, according to the New Testament, was seized and beaten by the mob in the presence of Gallio, the Roman governor, when he refused to proceed against Paul at the instigation of the Jews (Acts 18:12-17). The motives of this assault against Sosthenes are not recorded, nor is it mentioned whether it was made by Greeks or Romans. Some identify him with one whom Paul calls "Sosthenes our brother," a convert to the faith and co-author of the First Epistle to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 1:1). It is not clear whether this identification is tenable. It has also been alleged that Sosthenes is a later name of Crispus, who is mentioned in Acts 18:8 and 1 Corinthians 1:14.
1 Corinthians never mentions the people meeting in synagogues or "being" a synagogue. God's people there are called "the church (ekklesia)". Undoubtedly, many Jewish and Gentile believers in Corinth came out of the synagogue, especially with the number one Jewish man of the city believing. If Sosthenes and Crispus are, indeed, the same person; we can see how wide his influence must have been.

I see what you are saying about the use of "church". But I don't think the word "church" was necessarily solely used to distinguish between synagogue from church (as they both mean essentially the same thing in LXX and with the example of Jesus' usage of church). Jewish-Christian synagogues existed from the earliest times. They would have said they assembled in "synagogues"...but were also members of the one, universal, "church". Other than this, I think we're splitting hairs....
You wrote:1. Do you think we should keep the Sabbath? (Or 10 commandments, if you prefer)

2. Re: the Gentiles who went to synagogue on Sabbaths, you wrote:
I didn't realize going to the synagogue on the seventh day was what God considered "keeping the Sabbath".
1. I say I "keep the Sabbath" when I go to church on the weekend. It might be on Saturday evening or Sunday morning and/or evening. I posted earlier that a Sunday evening is really a Monday evening by the Jewish calendar (which gets back to splitting hairs, imo). But I, myself, equate this with observing, and/or "keeping" and obeying the Fourth Commandment.

I consider myself bound to the 10 Commandments but don't interpret the Fourth Commandment legalistically. That is, I don't meet everyone's standards on this---just my own---according to my conscience and understanding of the Bible. I do not insist that everyone sees things my way.

In a sense, I can say I "replace" the actual Sabbath when I go to church on Sundays (which upsets Sabbatarian legalists). Others disagree that I can legitimately go to church on Saturdays (strict Lord's Day/Sunday-ists). To me, either day, it doesn't matter; and I won't get put under bondage by anyone! "Let every man be convinced in his own mind."

2. It was Paul's, the Jews', and the God-fearers' custom to go to synagogue on Sabbaths. How much of the entire law they "did" was decided by who they were; Jews had to do the whole law; God-fearing Gentiles didn't have to, but wanted, to go to synagogue (which was what made them God-fearers). They "kept" (did, observed, practiced) the Fourth Commandment by the standards that were set for them on it: "Come if you want to." They could go to synagogue, go home, and have a ham sandwich....
You wrote:Act 15:36 Then after some days Paul said to Barnabas, "Let us now go back and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they are doing."

So did they go back to the synagogues?
In all of this, Paul (and Barnabas or Silas) were operating in two ways: (1) as Jewish(-Christian) missionaries who sought converts both inside and outside of synagogues and (2) as itinerant preachers, in the same manner as the disciples had been sent by Jesus.

Paul and Barnabas surely didn't go back to the synagogues they had either been kicked out of or left on purpose. Acts doesn't tell about the establishment of new messianic synagogues, though there undoubtedly were some time before and after Paul & Company came to town (as in Rome). In Rome we don't know if whole synagogues were converted or not (I don't anyway, but feel they could have been and probably were).

Paul's letters never say "to the synagogue in ____." He writes to individual churches in cities which are in the universal church. So, Paul calls these gatherings the "church(es)". However, that isn't to say there weren't messianic synagogues who continued to identify themselves as such: These existed till the 6th century. Who preached to them first, we don't know....

Rick
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:45 pm

Hi Thomas
You wrote:Paul's action in defending the Gentiles against circumcision , in and of itself , set up two seperate standards of behavior. Not to make them adversaries but to , if possible , have them peacefully co-exist. (seperate but equal ?)
Yes, I can see that, :wink:

I've had the idea that Paul, seeing he received teaching directly from Jesus (Gal 1:12, Eph 3:2), had a deeper insight than the Jerusalem church into how the universal church was going to be established. In a way, I feel his was "ahead" of them in this.

But his willingness to compromise was always there also. He always made things "doable" and worked with people as a team (to use a workplace-(job)-analogy).

As mentioned before, Paul almost had to offer those animal sacrifices, which is unimaginable to me! I'm undecided to what extent this was compromising...or...Paul's trying to simply save his life!!!

"But the Lord delivered us out of them all....".
Rick

P.S. I'm sort of getting tired of this topic as I've been thru it before. I'll probably get a new thread on Romans 7 going soon also :)
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:25 pm

Rick,

You wrote:
I consider myself bound to the 10 Commandments but don't interpret the Fourth Commandment legalistically. That is, I don't meet everyone's standards on this---just my own---according to my conscience and understanding of the Bible. I do not insist that everyone sees things my way.
I am curious regarding how you consider yourself bound by the ten commandments and not the rest of the law? Why do you separate them out from the rest of the law? What is there in scripture that would cause you to do this? I know it is popular today to classify the law into legal, ceremonial, and moral categories, but that is a distinction unthought of by any of the New Testament writers. Seems to me The Law stands or falls as a whole.

Paul, in 2 Corinthians 3, speaks of the "10" themselves as being done away. I realize this might alarm some, but all of them are exceeded by the teaching of the N. T., except keeping a Sabbath. To me its like living in England and being forbidden to commit murder, then moving to the US, where it is also illegal to commit murder, and saying you are not allowed to commit murder because it was illegal in England.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:30 am

Hello Homer,

I'm in the middle of the deepest study I've done on Romans 7, trying to resolve some questions I've had about it all my life.

I think I'd do best by focusing only on Romans 7 right now.
(Sorry, but I'm going to drop out of this discussion).

I've seen a zillion debates on this topic before and it's starting to get on my nerves (again). So, I'd better go....

God bless you,
Rick
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:06 am

Rick_C wrote:Hello Sean
I wrote:1. Most of the Gentile converts Paul and Barnabas "got" on their first missional journey were not regular Gentiles; they were God-fearers. I'm not saying every single one of them were but, from Acts, it appears they were a majority; they at least "felt free" to go to a synagogue {Acts 13:46-48}.

You replied:
Not sure what this has to do with anything.
Many Christians mistakenly think that when Paul preached to Gentiles, it was always outside of the synagogues. This is why I mention it (or what it has to do with anything). His first Gentile converts on record were God-fearers, right out of the synagogue in Pisidian Anticoch.

If you go through Acts, if a city had a synagague, Paul always went there. I haven't counted the percentage of when this was the case, but would think it would be at least 80 percent of the time. And since the synagogues had God-fearers; Paul's Gentile converts came from the synagogues more often than is realized; perhaps as much 80 percent of them (?). Of course, there were times when Paul preached to "regular" Gentiles, such as in Athens.
Instead of me saying: "Not sure what this has to do with anything." I should have stated that I didn't know what this had to do with the original point. ;) Since you stated this as a reply to my quote about the Jerusalem council decision.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

Post Reply

Return to “Ethics”