Damon wrote:JJB wrote:I do not see an example of man thwarting God's will. How is it you see that in that passage? Perhaps we should take this to another thread, as this is not dealing with alternative views of hell.
Well, let me just briefly address it here, because there is a connection. If we need to discuss it further, then let's move it to another thread.
God wanted to bring all Israel into the Promised Land at that time. But ten of the spies brought back an evil report and the people refused to trust that God could bring them in anyway, no matter how difficult it might have seemed. So, they thwarted God's will (to bring them into the Promised Land)
in the short term. Nevertheless, God still brought the next generation of Israelites into the land 38 years later.
This connects with the various views of Hell because of the analogy in Hebrews 3:7-4:11. The Promised Land is the Kingdom of God. The "rest" is not having to struggle day by day to meet one's outward as well as inward needs. This is achieved in actuality in the Kingdom, when we no longer have to work in order to live, and when we no longer have to worry about loving and being loved. This is achieved in type in the Body of Christ, when we no longer have to doubt that God will provide for our needs, even when circumstances look very difficult (as with the Israelites who wandered in the wilderness for 40 years; who fed them during that time?), and when we learn to love one another even in our weaknesses and struggles, just as Christ loved us.
One who can't love and trust, cannot enter into God's "rest". But nevertheless, God will still have mercy on them, and that was what I was getting at when I quoted Isaiah 29:22-24.
However, one who not only can't love and trust but rejects God entirely,
knowing full well what they are rejecting (see Heb. 6:4-8 ), not only can't enter God's "rest" but are condemned to hell fire.
I hope that's a sufficient answer to your statement regarding Christ's sacrifice, and my reply that one must still accept it first.
Damon